首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Consumer versus resource control of producer diversity depends on ecosystem type and producer community structure
【2h】

Consumer versus resource control of producer diversity depends on ecosystem type and producer community structure

机译:生产者多样性的消费者与资源控制取决于生态系统类型和生产者社区结构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Consumer and resource control of diversity in plant communities have long been treated as alternative hypotheses. However, experimental and theoretical evidence suggests that herbivores and nutrient resources interactively regulate the number and relative abundance of coexisting plant species. Experiments have yielded divergent and often contradictory responses within and among ecosystems, and no effort has to date reconciled this empirical variation within a general framework. Using data from 274 experiments from marine, freshwater, and terrestrial ecosystems, we present a cross-system analysis of producer diversity responses to local manipulations of resource supply and/or herbivory. Effects of herbivory and fertilization on producer richness differed substantially between systems: (i) herbivores reduced species richness in freshwater but tended to increase richness in terrestrial systems; (ii) fertilization increased richness in freshwater systems but reduced richness on land. Fertilization consistently reduced evenness, whereas herbivores increased evenness only in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Producer community evenness and ecosystem productivity mediated fertilization and herbivore effects on diversity across ecosystems. Herbivores increased producer richness in more productive habitats and in producer assemblages with low evenness. These same assemblages also showed the strongest reduction in richness with fertilization, whereas fertilization increased (and herbivory decreased) richness in producer assemblages with high evenness. Our study indicates that system productivity and producer evenness determine the direction and magnitude of top-down and bottom-up control of diversity and may reconcile divergent empirical results within and among ecosystems.
机译:长期以来,植物群落中消费者和资源对多样性的控制已被视为另一种假设。但是,实验和理论证据表明,草食动物和营养资源相互作用地调节了共存植物物种的数量和相对丰度。实验已经在生态系统之内和之间产生了分歧的,常常是矛盾的反应,迄今为止,还没有任何努力可以在总体框架内协调这种经验上的变化。利用来自海洋,淡水和陆地生态系统的274个实验的数据,我们提出了对生产者多样性对资源供应和/或草食动物的本地操纵的反应的跨系统分析。食草和施肥对生产者丰富度的影响在不同系统之间有很大差异:(i)食草动物减少了淡水物种的丰富度,但往往增加了陆地系统的丰富度; (ii)施肥增加了淡水系统的丰富度,但减少了土地上的丰富度。施肥持续降低均匀度,而草食动物仅在海洋和陆地生态系统中增加均匀度。生产者社区的均匀性和生态系统生产力介导了施肥和草食动物对整个生态系统多样性的影响。草食动物在生产力更高的栖息地和低均匀度的生产者组合中增加了生产者的丰富度。这些相同的组合还显示出施肥使富集性下降最明显,而生产者组合中的受精则以较高的均匀度增加了(草食性降低了)。我们的研究表明,系统生产力和生产者均匀性决定了自上而下和自下而上的多样性控制的方向和幅度,并可能使生态系统内部和生态系统之间的不同经验结果协调一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号