首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Postgraduate Medical Journal >Performance of clinical referral criteria for bone densitometry in patients under 65 years of age assessed by spine bone mineral density
【2h】

Performance of clinical referral criteria for bone densitometry in patients under 65 years of age assessed by spine bone mineral density

机译:通过脊柱骨矿物质密度评估的65岁以下患者的骨密度测定临床参考标准的执行

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: A case finding strategy based on a number of established risk factors has been suggested by Royal College of Physicians' (RCP) guidelines to optimise bone densitometry referrals for assessment of osteoporosis. >Objective: The performance of clinical referral criteria was examined in women and men aged <65 years referred for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. >Study design: Cross sectional observational study over six months. >Results: Though BMD tended to be lower in patients with multiple criteria for referral, differences from those referred with a single criterion were not statistically significant. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis was higher than expected in both sexes, 11.6% in women and 27.5% in men (expected prevalences were 8% and <1% respectively). BMD was significantly lower in patients referred with a single criterion compatible with the RCP guidelines than in age matched controls or in those patients referred with non-RCP criteria (mean (SD) Z score –0.47(1.38) v 0.35(1.41), p<0.001). Low body mass index was also significantly associated with a lower than expected BMD. In contrast, spine BMD was higher than expected in those with self reported back pain, loss of height, or spinal curvature (p = NS). >Conclusion: Most of the criteria recommended by the RCP performed well in identifying relatively younger patients with low BMD and osteoporosis. However, prior fractures and corticosteroid use did not reach statistical significance probably due to inclusion of all energy fractures, and current or past steroid use of unspecified dose or duration. Criteria like loss of height and/or spine curvature perform relatively poorly, reflecting the need for further investigation to better identify those needing BMD assessment.
机译:>背景:皇家内科医师学院(RCP)指南提出了一种基于许多已确定的危险因素的病例发现策略,以优化骨密度测定转诊以评估骨质疏松症。 >目的:我们对年龄<65岁的男性和女性进行骨矿物质密度(BMD)评估的临床转诊标准进行了检查。 >研究设计:为期六个月的横断面观察研究。 >结果:尽管有多种转诊标准的患者的BMD较低,但与采用单一标准转诊的患者的差异无统计学意义。男女患骨质疏松症的总体患病率均高于预期,女性为11.6%,男性为2​​7.5%(预期患病率分别为8%和<1%)。在与RCP指南兼容的单一标准下转诊的患者的BMD显着低于与年龄匹配的对照组或非RCP标准下转诊的患者的BMD(平均值(SD)Z评分–0.47(1.38)v 0.35(1.41),p <0.001)。低体重指数还与低于预期的BMD显着相关。相反,在自我报告的背痛,身高降低或脊柱弯曲的患者中,脊柱BMD高于预期(p = NS)。 >结论:RCP推荐的大多数标准在识别相对年轻的BMD和骨质疏松症患者中表现良好。但是,先前的骨折和皮质类固醇激素的使用未达到统计学意义,可能是由于包括了所有能量骨折,以及当前或过去未指定剂量或持续时间的类固醇激素的使用。诸如身高下降和/或脊柱弯曲等标准的表现相对较差,反映出需要进行进一步调查以更好地识别需要进行BMD评估的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号