首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Medicine >Low-intensity cognitive-behaviour therapy interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to waiting list for therapist-led cognitive-behaviour therapy: 3-arm randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness
【2h】

Low-intensity cognitive-behaviour therapy interventions for obsessive-compulsive disorder compared to waiting list for therapist-led cognitive-behaviour therapy: 3-arm randomised controlled trial of clinical effectiveness

机译:与治疗师主导的认知行为治疗的等待名单相比强迫症的低强度认知行为治疗干预措施:3项临床有效性随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is prevalent and without adequate treatment usually follows a chronic course. “High-intensity” cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) from a specialist therapist is current “best practice.” However, access is difficult because of limited numbers of therapists and because of the disabling effects of OCD symptoms. There is a potential role for “low-intensity” interventions as part of a stepped care model. Low-intensity interventions (written or web-based materials with limited therapist support) can be provided remotely, which has the potential to increase access. However, current evidence concerning low-intensity interventions is insufficient. We aimed to determine the clinical effectiveness of 2 forms of low-intensity CBT prior to high-intensity CBT, in adults meeting the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for OCD.
机译:背景强迫症(OCD)普遍存在,未经适当的治疗通常会伴随慢性病。专业治疗师的“高强度”认知行为疗法(CBT)是当前的“最佳实践”。但是,由于治疗师的数量有限以及OCD症状的致残作用,很难获得药物。作为分级护理模型的一部分,“低强度”干预措施可能具有潜在作用。可以远程提供低强度干预措施(治疗师支持有限的书面或基于Web的材料),这可能会增加访问权限。但是,目前有关低强度干预措施的证据不足。我们旨在确定在满足OCD精神病诊断和统计手册第四版(DSM-IV)标准的成年人中,在高强度CBT之前先进行两种形式的低强度CBT的临床疗效。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号