首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>PLoS Genetics >Reviving the Dead: History and Reactivation of an Extinct L1
【2h】

Reviving the Dead: History and Reactivation of an Extinct L1

机译:死者复活:灭绝的L1的历史和重新激活

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although L1 sequences are present in the genomes of all placental mammals and marsupials examined to date, their activity was lost in the megabat family, Pteropodidae, ∼24 million years ago. To examine the characteristics of L1s prior to their extinction, we analyzed the evolutionary history of L1s in the genome of a megabat, Pteropus vampyrus, and found a pattern of periodic L1 expansion and quiescence. In contrast to the well-characterized L1s in human and mouse, megabat genomes have accommodated two or more simultaneously active L1 families throughout their evolutionary history, and major peaks of L1 deposition into the genome always involved multiple families. We compared the consensus sequences of the two major megabat L1 families at the time of their extinction to consensus L1s of a variety of mammalian species. Megabat L1s are comparable to the other mammalian L1s in terms of adenosine content and conserved amino acids in the open reading frames (ORFs). However, the intergenic region (IGR) of the reconstructed element from the more active family is dramatically longer than the IGR of well-characterized human and mouse L1s. We synthesized the reconstructed element from this L1 family and tested the ability of its components to support retrotransposition in a tissue culture assay. Both ORFs are capable of supporting retrotransposition, while the IGR is inhibitory to retrotransposition, especially when combined with either of the reconstructed ORFs. We dissected the inhibitory effect of the IGR by testing truncated and shuffled versions and found that length is a key factor, but not the only one affecting inhibition of retrotransposition. Although the IGR is inhibitory to retrotransposition, this inhibition does not account for the extinction of L1s in megabats. Overall, the evolution of the L1 sequence or the quiescence of L1 is unlikely the reason of L1 extinction.
机译:尽管迄今为止检查过的所有胎盘哺乳动物和有袋动物的基因组中都存在L1序列,但它们的活性在大约2400万年前的巨蝙蝠科翼足类中丧失了。为了检查L1s灭绝之前的特征,我们分析了巨型蝙蝠(Pteropus vampyrus)基因组中L1s的进化史,并发现了周期性L1扩张和静止的模式。与人和小鼠中特征明确的L1相比,megabat基因组在其整个进化历史中已经容纳了两个或多个同时活跃的L1家族,并且L1沉积到基因组中的主要高峰始终涉及多个家族。我们比较了两个主要的megabat L1家族灭绝时的共有序列与各种哺乳动物物种的共有L1的比较。 Megabat L1在开放阅读框(ORF)中的腺苷含量和保守氨基酸方面可与其他哺乳动物L1媲美。但是,来自活跃家族的重组元件的基因间区域(IGR)远比特征明确的人和小鼠L1的IGR长得多。我们合成了来自该L1家族的重建元件,并在组织培养测定中测试了其成分支持逆转座的能力。两种ORF都能够支持逆转座,而IGR则抑制逆转座,尤其是当与两个重建的ORF结合使用时。我们通过测试截短和混排的形式来剖析IGR的抑制作用,发现长度是关键因素,但不是唯一影响抑制逆转座的因素。尽管IGR对逆转座具有抑制作用,但这种抑制作用不能解释巨型蝙蝠中L1的灭绝。总体而言,L1序列的进化或L1的静止不太可能是L1灭绝的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号