首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences >Command and control of Sierra Leones Ebola outbreak response: evolution of the response architecture
【2h】

Command and control of Sierra Leones Ebola outbreak response: evolution of the response architecture

机译:塞拉利昂埃博拉疫情暴发应对的指挥与控制:应对架构的演变

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Management, coordination and logistics were critical for responding effectively to the Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone, and the duration of the epidemic provided a rare opportunity to study the management of an outbreak that endured long enough for the response to mature. This qualitative study examines the structures and systems used to manage the response, and how and why they changed and evolved. It also discusses the quality of relationships between key responders and their impact. Early coordination mechanisms failed and the President took operational control away from the Ministry of Health and Sanitation and established a National Ebola Response Centre, headed by the Minister of Defence, and District Ebola Response Centres. British civilian and military personnel were deeply embedded in this command and control architecture and, together with the United Nations Mission for Ebola Emergency Response lead, were the dominant coordination partners at the national level. Coordination, politics and tensions in relationships hampered the response, but as the response mechanisms matured, coordination improved and rifts healed. Simultaneously setting up new organizations, processes and plans as well as attempting to reconcile different cultures, working practices and personalities in such an emergency was bound to be challenging.This article is part of the themed issue ‘The 2013–2016 West African Ebola epidemic: data, decision-making and disease control’.
机译:管理,协调和后勤对于有效应对塞拉利昂的埃博拉疫情至关重要,这一流行病的持续时间为研究疫情的管理提供了难得的机会,该疫情持续了足够长的时间才能成熟。这项定性研究考察了用于管理响应的结构和系统,以及它们如何以及为何发生变化和发展。它还讨论了关键响应者之间的关系质量及其影响。早期的协调机制失败了,总统将卫生和卫生部的业务控制权移交给了卫生部长,并建立了由国防部长领导的国家埃博拉应对中心和埃博拉地区应对中心。英国文职和军事人员深深地融入了这种指挥和控制架构,并与联合国埃博拉紧急反应特派团领导一道,成为了国家一级的主要协调伙伴。关系中的协调,政治和紧张局势阻碍了回应,但是随着回应机制的成熟,协调得到改善,裂痕得以he愈。同时建立新的组织,流程和计划,并试图在这种紧急情况下调和不同的文化,工作习惯和个性,这无疑是具有挑战性的。本文属于主题问题“ 2013-2016年西非埃博拉疫情:数据,决策和疾病控制”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号