首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Ochsner Journal >Colistin and Polymyxin B Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations Determined by Etest Found Unreliable for Gram-Negative Bacilli
【2h】

Colistin and Polymyxin B Minimal Inhibitory Concentrations Determined by Etest Found Unreliable for Gram-Negative Bacilli

机译:通过Etest确定的共利斯汀和多粘菌素B的最小抑菌浓度对革兰氏阴性杆菌不可靠

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background:A reliable method of polymyxin B and E (colistin) susceptibility testing remains elusive. These drugs diffuse poorly into agar, creating potentially inaccurate Etest and disk diffusion results, and testing by these methods is not recommended. Broth microdilution is the reference testing method, although it can be sometimes difficult to interpret. Currently, when a colistin susceptibility test is ordered for a patient in the Ochsner Health System, our diagnostic microbiology laboratory performs the Etest. As an in-house quality assessment project, we compared colistin and polymyxin B minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) determined by Etest with MICs determined by broth microdilution to evaluate whether colistin MICs are accurately being reported by Etest.
机译:背景:一种可靠的多粘菌素B和E(colistin)敏感性测试方法仍然难以捉摸。这些药物很难在琼脂中扩散,可能会产生不准确的Etest和磁盘扩散结果,因此不建议通过这些方法进行测试。肉汤微量稀释是参考测试方法,尽管有时可能难以解释。当前,当在Ochsner Health System中为患者订购大肠菌素敏感性测试时,我们的诊断微生物学实验室将进行Etest。作为一项内部质量评估项目,我们将通过Etest测定的粘菌素和多粘菌素B最低抑菌浓度(MIC)与通过肉汤微稀释法测定的MIC进行了比较,以评估Etest是否准确报告了粘菌素MIC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号