首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Nutrients >The Glycaemic Index-Food-Frequency Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire Designed to Estimate the Dietary Intake of Glycaemic Index and Glycaemic Load: An Effort by the PREVIEW Consortium
【2h】

The Glycaemic Index-Food-Frequency Questionnaire: Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire Designed to Estimate the Dietary Intake of Glycaemic Index and Glycaemic Load: An Effort by the PREVIEW Consortium

机译:血糖指数-食物频率调查表:食品频率调查表的开发和验证该调查表旨在估计膳食摄入的血糖指数和血糖负荷:PREVIEW联盟的一项努力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dietary glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) are indices used to quantify the effect of carbohydrate quality and quantity on postprandial glycaemia. GI/GL-health associations are widely studied but data on the validity of integrated GI/GL measurements are scarce. We evaluated the performance of a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) specifically developed to assess GI/GL. In total, 263 Dutch men and 212 women (aged 55 ± 11 years) completed a 58-item GI-FFQ, an 183-item general-FFQ and a 2-day 24 h-recall and donated blood for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) determination. The level of agreement between these methods was evaluated by (1) cross-classification, (2) correlations and (3) Bland and Altman plots. The three dietary assessment methods provided comparable mean intake estimates for total carbohydrates (range: 214–237 g/day), mono/disaccharides (100–107 g/day), polysaccharides (114–132 g/day), as well as bread, breakfast cereals, potatoes, pasta, rice, fruit, dairy, cakes/cookies and sweets. Mean (±SD) GI estimates were also comparable between the GI-FFQ (54 ± 3), general-FFQ (53 ± 4) and 24 h-recalls (53 ± 5). Mean (±SD) GI-FFQ GL (117 ± 37) was slightly lower than the general-FFQ GL (126 ± 38) and 24 h-recalls GL (127 ± 37). Classification of GI in quartiles was identical for the GI-FFQ and general-FFQ for 43% of the population (r = 0.58) and with 24 h-recalls for 35% of the population (de-attenuated r = 0.64). For GL, this was 48% (r = 0.65) and 44% (de-attenuated r = 0.74). Correlations between GI and HbA1c were low (r = −0.09 for GI-FFQ, r = −0.04 for general-FFQ and r = 0.07 for 24 h-recalls). In conclusion, compared to a general-FFQ and 24 h-recalls, the GI-FFQ showed a moderate to good relative validity for carbohydrates, carbohydrate-rich foods and GI/GL. No metric predicted HbA1c.
机译:膳食血糖指数(GI)和血糖负荷(GL)是用于量化碳水化合物质量和数量对餐后血糖的影响的指数。 GI / GL-健康协会得到了广泛的研究,但有关GI / GL综合测量有效性的数据很少。我们评估了专门为评估GI / GL而设计的食物频率问卷(FFQ)的效果。总计263名荷兰男性和212名女性(55±11岁)完成了58项GI-FFQ,183项普通FFQ和2天24小时召回,并为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)献血判定。这些方法之间的一致性水平通过(1)交叉分类,(2)相关性和(3)Bland和Altman图进行评估。三种饮食评估方法对总碳水化合物(范围:214–237 g /天),单/双糖(100–107 g /天),多糖(114–132 g /天)和面包的平均摄入量估计值具有可比性,早餐谷物,土豆,面食,米饭,水果,乳制品,蛋糕/饼干和糖果。 GI-FFQ(54±3),一般-FFQ(53±4)和24 h召回(53±5)之间的平均(±SD)GI估计值也相当。平均(±SD)GI-FFQ GL(117±37)略低于一般FFQ GL(126±38)和24 h回忆GL(127±37)。四分位数中的GI分类对于GI-FFQ和普通FFQ而言是相同的,占总人口的43%(r = 0.58),而对35%的人口有24 h呼出率(减毒r = 0.64)。对于GL,这是48%(r = 0.65)和44%(去衰减r = 0.74)。 GI和HbA1c之间的相关性很低(GI-FFQ的r = -0.09,General-FFQ的r = -0.04,24 h召回的r = 0.07)。总之,与普通FFQ和24小时召回相比,GI-FFQ对碳水化合物,富含碳水化合物的食物和GI / GL具有中等至良好的相对有效性。没有度量标准预测的HbA1c。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号