首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>NeuroImage : Clinical >The regulation of positive and negative emotions through instructed causal attributions in lifetime depression – A functional magnetic resonance imaging study
【2h】

The regulation of positive and negative emotions through instructed causal attributions in lifetime depression – A functional magnetic resonance imaging study

机译:通过指示性因果归因调节人生抑郁中的正负情绪–功能性磁共振成像研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Adequate emotional control is essential for mental health. Deficiencies in emotion regulation are evident in many psychiatric disorders, including depression. Patients with depression show, for instance, disrupted neural emotion regulation in cognitive regulation regions such as lateral and medial prefrontal cortices. Since depressed individuals tend to attribute positive events to external circumstances and negative events to themselves, modifying this non-self-serving attributional style may represent a promising regulation strategy. Spontaneous causal attributions are generally processed in medial brain structures, particularly the precuneus. However, so far no study has investigated neural correlates of instructed causal attributions (e.g. instructing a person to intentionally relate positive events to the self) and their potential to regulate emotions. The current study therefore aimed to examine how instructed causal attributions of positive and negative events affect the emotional experience of depressed individuals as well as its neural bases. For this purpose pictures of sad and happy faces were presented to 26 patients with a lifetime major depression (MDD) and 26 healthy controls (HC) during fMRI. Participants should respond naturally (“view”) or imagine that the person on the picture was sad/happy because of them (“internal attribution”) or because something else happened (“external attribution”). Trait attributional style and depressive symptoms were assessed with questionnaires to examine potential influential factors on emotion regulation ability.Results revealed that patients compared to controls show a non-self-serving trait attributional style (i.e. more external attributions of positive events and more internal attributions of negative events). Intriguingly, when instructed to apply specific causal attributions during the emotion regulation task, patients and controls were similarly able to regulate positive and negative emotions. Regulating emotions through instructed attributions (internal/external attribution>view) generally engaged the precuneus, which was correlated with patients' trait attributional style (i.e. more precuneus activation during external>view was linked to a general tendency to relate positive events to external sources). Up-regulating happiness through internal (compared to external) attributions recruited the parahippocampal gyrus only in controls. The down-regulation of sadness (external>internal attribution), in contrast, engaged the superior frontal gyrus only in patients. Superior frontal gyrus activation thereby correlated with depression severity, which implies a greater need of cognitive resources for a successful regulation in more severely depressed. Patients and controls did not differ in activation in brain regions related to cognitive emotion regulation or attribution. However, results point to a disturbed processing of positive emotions in depression. Interestingly, increased precuneus resting-state connectivity with emotion regulation brain regions (inferior parietal lobule, middle frontal gyrus) was linked to healthier attributions (i.e. external attributions of negative events) in patients and controls. Adequate neural communication between these regions therefore seem to facilitate an adaptive trait attributional style. Findings of this study emphasize that despite patients' dysfunctional trait attributional style, explicitly applying causal attributions effectively regulates emotions. Future research should examine the efficacy of instructed attributions in reducing negative affect and anhedonia in depressed patients, for instance by means of attribution trainings during psychotherapy.
机译:适当的情绪控制对于心理健康至关重要。在许多精神疾病,包括抑郁症中,情绪调节的缺陷很明显。例如,抑郁症患者的认知调节区域(如外侧和内侧前额叶皮层)的神经情感调节受到破坏。由于沮丧的个体倾向于将积极事件归因于外部环境,将消极事件归因于自身,因此修改这种非自我维护的归因风格可能代表着一种有前途的调节策略。自发的因果归因通常在大脑的内侧结构中处理,特别是在前神经突中。然而,到目前为止,尚无研究调查指示性因果归因的神经相关性(例如,指示一个人故意将积极事件与自身联系起来)及其调节情绪的潜力。因此,当前的研究旨在检验正向和负向事件的因果归因如何影响抑郁者的情感体验及其神经基础。为此,在fMRI期间向26位一生终生重度抑郁(MDD)和26位健康对照(HC)的患者呈现了悲伤和高兴的面孔的照片。参与者应该自然地做出回应(“查看”),或者想象图片上的那个人因为他们(“内部归因”)或其他事情(“外部归因”)而感到悲伤/快乐。通过问卷调查评估特质归因风格和抑郁症状,以调查可能影响情绪调节能力的因素。结果显示,与对照组相比,患者表现出非自我服务的特质归因风格(即积极事件的更多外部归因和积极情绪的更多内部归因)负面事件)。有趣的是,当被指示在情绪调节任务中应用特定的因果归因时,患者和控制者同样能够调节正面和负面情绪。通过指示性归因(内部/外部归因>观点)调节情绪通常会影响早孕,这与患者的特质归因风格相关(即,在外部>观察时更多的早孕激活与将积极事件与外部来源相关的一般趋势相关) 。通过内部(相对于外部)归因上调幸福感仅在对照中招募了海马旁回。相比之下,悲伤的下调(外部>内部归因)仅在患者中参与了上额回。因此,上额额回的激活与抑郁症的严重程度相关,这意味着需要更多的认知资源来成功控制重度抑郁症患者。患者和对照组在与认知情绪调节或归因相关的大脑区域的激活方面没有差异。但是,结果表明抑郁症中积极情绪的处理受到干扰。有趣的是,与情绪调节大脑区域(下顶叶,中额额回)相关的早孕前静止状态连接性增加与患者和对照组的健康归因(即负面事件的外部归因)相关。因此,这些区域之间的适当神经沟通似乎促进了适应性状的归因风格。这项研究的结果强调,尽管患者功能障碍的特征归因方式不正确,但明确应用因果归因可以有效调节情绪。未来的研究应检查指示性归因在减少抑郁症患者的负面影响和快感方面的功效,例如通过心理治疗中的归因训练。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号