首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Neuro-Oncology >MS-14PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT ATYPICAL MENINGIOMA AFTER UPFRONT SURGICAL RESECTION SALVAGED WITH RADIOSURGERY REQUIRE MORE SALVAGE PROCEDURES THAN PATIENTS SALVAGED WITH CONVENTIONAL RADIATION
【2h】

MS-14PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT ATYPICAL MENINGIOMA AFTER UPFRONT SURGICAL RESECTION SALVAGED WITH RADIOSURGERY REQUIRE MORE SALVAGE PROCEDURES THAN PATIENTS SALVAGED WITH CONVENTIONAL RADIATION

机译:MS-14患者在接受放射外科手术后进行超常规手术切除后复发的非典型脑膜瘤需要比常规放射治疗的患者更多的挽救措施

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal salvage radiation treatment for recurrent atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas after upfront surgery alone. METHODS: 35 patients (1997-2013) were treated at the Cleveland Clinic for histologically confirmed atypical meningiomas with upfront surgery alone and eventually required salvage radiation for recurrence. Patients were treated with either fractionated conventional radiation (RT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Patients were grouped into a gross total resection group (GTR) or a subtotal resection group (STR) based on Simpson grade and operative notes. Local failure (LF) was defined as failure at or immediately adjacent to the resection cavity. Univariate analysis and Cox regression modeling was used for statistical analysis. Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Median age and follow up were 62 years (range 30-77) and 28 mo (range: 10-240), respectively. 23 patients received salvage RT and 12 had SRS. Median total dose for RT and SRS were 5940 cGy (range: 2500 - 6000) and 1400 cGy (range: 1000 - 1800), respectively. 10/23 patients (43.4%) experienced LF in the RT group and 8/12 patients (66.7%) experienced LF in the SRS group. Extent of initial resection (STR vs GTR, p = 0.12), number of pre-salvage radiation surgeries (1 vs 2 + , p = 0.79), and choice of salvage (RT vs SRS, p = 0.96) did not correlate with local relapse-free survival (LRFS). The number of additional salvage procedures after radiation (post-RT salvage) was significantly different (p = 0.02) between the RT (mean: 0.52 ± 1.1) and SRS groups (mean: 1.33 ± 1.3). OS was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.32). CONCLUSION: Patients initially salvaged with SRS were more likely to require additional salvage procedures, suggesting that the entire resection bed is at risk for recurrence and comprehensive radiation may be necessary. SRS can be used to salvage recurrence after salvage RT.
机译:目的/目的:确定仅在前期手术后复发性非典型(WHO II级)脑膜瘤的最佳抢救性放射治疗。方法:35例患者(1997-2013年)在克利夫兰诊所接受了组织学确认为非典型脑膜瘤的治疗,仅需进行前期手术,最终需要进行挽救性放疗才能复发。患者采用常规常规放射(RT)或立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗。根据辛普森分级和手术记录,将患者分为总切除组(GTR)或次全切除组(STR)。局部衰竭(LF)定义为切除腔或紧邻切除腔的失败。使用单变量分析和Cox回归建模进行统计分析。 Kaplan-Meier和对数秩检验用于生存分析。结果:中位年龄和随访年龄分别为62岁(30-77岁)和28 mo(10-240岁)。 23例接受了挽救性放疗,12例接受了SRS。 RT和SRS的中位总剂量分别为5940 cGy(范围:2500-6000)和1400 cGy(范围:1000-1800)。 RT组有10/23例患者(43.4%)经历过LF,SRS组有8/12例患者(66.7%)经历过LF。初次切除的范围(STR vs GTR,p = 0.12),抢救前放射外科手术的次数(1 vs 2 +,p = 0.79)以及抢救的选择(RT vs SRS,p = 0.96)与局部切除不相关无复发生存期(LRFS)。放射治疗(均值:0.52±1.1)和SRS组(均值:1.33±1.3)之间,放疗后的其他挽救程序次数(RT后的挽救)显着不同(p = 0.02)。两组之间的OS无显着差异(p = 0.32)。结论:最初使用SRS抢救的患者更有可能需要额外的抢救程序,这表明整个切除床都有复发的风险,可能需要进行全面放疗。 SRS可用于挽救RT后挽救复发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号