首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Korean Journal of Family Medicine >Best Practice for Prolonged Fever in Primary Care Setting: Close Follow-Up or Empiric Antibiotic Therapy?
【2h】

Best Practice for Prolonged Fever in Primary Care Setting: Close Follow-Up or Empiric Antibiotic Therapy?

机译:在基层医疗机构中长期发热的最佳做法:密切随访还是经验性抗生素治疗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The management of prolonged fever in low-socioeconomic-status areas by primary care providers such as general practitioners is challenging. Given the endemic nature of many infectious diseases, physicians typically start empirical antibiotic therapy following a limited diagnostic workup including serologic examinations. Herein, we report the case of a young male patient with prolonged fever and arthralgia initially diagnosed with and treated for brucellosis but with a confirmed diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus on follow-up. This unique case shows that close follow-up is the best practice for managing prolonged fever in cases with non-specific laboratory findings.
机译:在低社会经济地位地区,由初级保健提供者(例如全科医生)管理长期发烧具有挑战性。考虑到许多传染病的地方性,医生通常会在有限的诊断检查(包括血清学检查)后开始进行经验性抗生素治疗。本文中,我们报道了一名年轻的男性患者,其长期发热和关节痛最初被布鲁氏菌病诊断并接受治疗,但在随访中被确诊为系统性红斑狼疮。这个独特的案例表明,在实验室检查结果不明确的情况下,密切随访是处理长期发烧的最佳实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号