首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Microbial Informatics and Experimentation >The importance of metagenomic surveys to microbial ecology: or why Darwin would have been a metagenomic scientist
【2h】

The importance of metagenomic surveys to microbial ecology: or why Darwin would have been a metagenomic scientist

机译:宏基因组学调查对微生物生态学的重要性:或者为什么达尔文会成为宏基因组学科学家

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Scientific discovery is incremental. The Merriam-Webster definition of 'Scientific Method' is "principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses". Scientists are taught to be excellent observers, as observations create questions, which in turn generate hypotheses. After centuries of science we tend to assume that we have enough observations to drive science, and enable the small steps and giant leaps which lead to theories and subsequent testable hypotheses. One excellent example of this is Charles Darwin's Voyage of the Beagle, which was essentially an opportunistic survey of biodiversity. Today, obtaining funding for even small-scale surveys of life on Earth is difficu but few argue the importance of the theory that was generated by Darwin from his observations made during this epic journey. However, these observations, even combined with the parallel work of Alfred Russell Wallace at around the same time have still not generated an indisputable 'law of biology'. The fact that evolution remains a 'theory', at least to the general public, suggests that surveys for new data need to be taken to a new level.
机译:科学发现是渐进的。 Merriam-Webster对“科学方法”的定义是“系统地追求知识的原理和程序,包括认识和提出问题,通过观察和实验收集数据以及提出和检验假设”。科学家被教导要成为优秀的观察者,因为观察会产生问题,进而产生假设。经过数个世纪的科学,我们倾向于假设我们有足够的观察力来推动科学发展,并实现导致理论和随后可验证假设的小步伐和巨大飞跃。一个很好的例子就是查尔斯·达尔文的《比格犬航行》,这本质上是对生物多样性的机会主义调查。今天,即使是对地球生命的小规模调查也很难获得资金。但是很少有人认为达尔文从他在史诗般的旅程中的观察所产生的理论的重要性。然而,这些观察结果,甚至与阿尔弗雷德·罗素·华莱士(Alfred Russell Wallace)在大约同一时间的平行研究相结合,仍未产生无可争辩的“生物学定律”。至少对于一般公众来说,进化仍然是一个“理论”,这表明对新数据的调查需要提高到一个新的水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号