首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine Research >IRBs Conflict and Liability: Will We See IRBs in Court? Or is it when?
【2h】

IRBs Conflict and Liability: Will We See IRBs in Court? Or is it when?

机译:内部评级法冲突与责任:我们会在法院看到内部评级法吗?还是什么时候?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The entire human research infrastructure is under intense and increasing financial pressure. These pressures may have been responsible for several errors in judgment by those responsible for managing human research and protecting human subjects. The result of these errors has been some terrible accidents, some of which have cost the lives of human research volunteers. This, in turn, is producing both increased liability risk for those who manage the various aspects of human research and increasing scrutiny as to the capability of the human research protection structure as currently constituted. It is the author's contention that the current structure is fully capable of offering sufficient protection for participants in human research–if Institutional Review Board (IRB) staff and members are given sufficient resources and perform their tasks with sufficient responsibility. The status quo alternative is that IRBs and their members will find themselves at great risk of becoming defendants in lawsuits seeking compensation for damages resulting from human experimentation gone awry.
机译:整个人类研究基础设施面临着巨大且日益增加的财务压力。这些压力可能导致负责管理人类研究和保护人类受试者的判断失误。这些错误的结果是发生了一些可怕的事故,其中一些事故使人类研究志愿者的生命丧命。反过来,这既给管理人类研究各个方面的人员带来了增加的责任风险,又对目前构成的人类研究保护结构的能力进行了越来越严格的审查。作者的观点是,如果机构审查委员会(IRB)的工作人员和成员有足够的资源并以充分的责任执行任务,则当前的结构完全有能力为人类研究的参与者提供足够的保护。在现状方面的替代方案是,IRB及其成员将面临成为被告人的巨大风险,这些人在为因人为实验而引起的损害赔偿寻求赔偿的诉讼中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号