首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Educational and Psychological Measurement >Using a Multidimensional IRT Framework to Better Understand Differential Item Functioning (DIF): A Tale of Three DIF Detection Procedures
【2h】

Using a Multidimensional IRT Framework to Better Understand Differential Item Functioning (DIF): A Tale of Three DIF Detection Procedures

机译:使用多维IRT框架更好地理解差异项目功能(DIF):三种DIF检测程序的故事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The theoretical reason for the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) is that data are multidimensional and two groups of examinees differ in their underlying ability distribution for the secondary dimension(s). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine how much the secondary ability distributions must differ before DIF is detected. Two-dimensional binary data sets were simulated using a compensatory multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) model, incrementally varying the mean difference on the second dimension between reference and focal group examinees while systematically increasing the correlation between dimensions. Three different DIF detection procedures were used to test for DIF: (1) SIBTEST, (2) Mantel–Haenszel, and (3) logistic regression. Results indicated that even with a very small mean difference on the secondary dimension, smaller than typically considered in previous research, DIF will be detected. Additional analyses indicated that even with the smallest mean difference considered in this study, 0.25, statistically significant differences will almost always be found between reference and focal group examinees on subtest scores consisting of items measuring the secondary dimension.
机译:存在差异项功能(DIF)的理论原因是数据是多维的,并且两组受检者在其次要维度的基础能力分布上有所不同。因此,本研究的目的是确定在检测到DIF之前,次级能力分布必须相差多少。使用补偿性多维项目响应理论(MIRT)模型对二维二进制数据集进行了模拟,逐步增加了参考和焦点小组考生在第二维度上的平均差异,同时系统地增加了维度之间的相关性。三种不同的DIF检测程序用于测试DIF:(1)SIBTEST,(2)Mantel–Haenszel和(3)Logistic回归。结果表明,即使在次级尺寸上的平均差异很小,小于以前研究中通常考虑的范围,DIF也会被检测到。进一步的分析表明,即使本研究中考虑的最小均值差异为0.25,也几乎总是在参考和焦点小组应试者之间的子测验分数中发现统计学上的显着差异,子测验分数由测量次要维度的项目组成。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号