首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Endoscopy International Open >Outcome of endoscopic resection of colonic polyps larger than 10 mm in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
【2h】

Outcome of endoscopic resection of colonic polyps larger than 10 mm in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

机译:炎症性肠病患者内镜下大于10mm的结肠息肉切除的结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background and study aims  There are limited published data on endoscopic removal of colorectal polyps by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). >Patients and methods  We performed a retrospective review of patients with colonic IBD and colonic polyps >10mm who underwent EMR and/or ESD at our institution between January 1, 2012 and June 31, 2016. >Results  Ninety-seven patients with pathology-confirmed IBD (median disease duration 16 years) were included. Mild or moderate active colitis (in background biopsies) was seen in 85 %. Of the total 124 polyps, location was ascending colon in 44 %, transverse in 15 % and sigmoid in 18.5 %; of the total, 55 % were < 20 mm and 45 % were ≥20mm in maximal diameter. Using the Paris classification, 56 % of polyps were polypoid sessile (Is) polyps, while 38 % were non-polypoid (IIa, IIb, IIc). EMR was used in 118 polyps, three required ESD, and three by combined EMR-ESD. Seventy-two percent were resected en-bloc; 28 % underwent piecemeal resection. Histology included low-grade dysplasia in 75, serrated adenoma in 31, and tubular adenoma in 14 polyps. Chromoendoscopy was used in 33 (26.6 %). Adverse events occurred in three patients. Colectomy was performed in 11 patients within 12 months. Recurrence was seen in 20 polyps, 11 of which were successfully resected en-bloc using EMR. Polyps ≥ 20 mm and polyps treated with APC were found to have a statistically significantly higher risk of recurrence. >Conclusion  This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection of large polyps in patients with IBD, making them effective alternatives to colectomy.
机译:>背景和研究目的 inflammatory关于炎症性肠病(IBD)患者的内镜黏膜切除术(EMR)和内窥镜黏膜剥离术(ESD)内镜切除结直肠息肉的数据很少。 >患者和方法我们对2012年1月1日至2016年6月31日期间在我院接受过EMR和/或ESD治疗的结肠IBD和结肠息肉大于10mm的患者进行了回顾性研究。>结果 included包括经病理证实的IBD(中位病程16年)的97例患者。轻度或中度活动性结肠炎(在背景活检中)占85%。在全部124个息肉中,升结肠的占44%,横结肠的占15%,乙状结肠的占18.5%。在总直径中,最大直径的55%<20mm,≥20mm的45%。根据巴黎分类,息肉中56%的息肉是无息肉(Is)息肉,而非息肉型息肉的38%是非息肉(IIa,IIb,IIc)。在118例息肉中使用了EMR,三项需要ESD,三项结合使用EMR-ESD。整体切除了72%; 28%的患者接受了零碎切除。组织学包括75例低度不典型增生,31例锯齿状腺瘤和14例息肉肾小管腺瘤。 33例中使用了内窥镜检查(占26.6%)。三名患者发生了不良事件。在12个月内对11例患者进行了结肠切除术。 20例息肉可见复发,其中11例已使用EMR整块切除。统计学上发现,≥20mm的息肉和经APC治疗的息肉具有较高的复发风险。 >结论这项研究证明了内镜切除大息肉对IBD患者的有效性和安全性,使其成为结肠切除术的有效替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号