首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Mayo Clinic Proceedings >Ethical Decision Making With End-of-Life Care: Palliative Sedation and Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatments
【2h】

Ethical Decision Making With End-of-Life Care: Palliative Sedation and Withholding or Withdrawing Life-Sustaining Treatments

机译:临终关怀的伦理决策:姑息镇静和中止或退出维持生命的治疗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Palliative sedation (PS) is the use of medications to induce decreased or absent awareness in order to relieve otherwise intractable suffering at the end of life. Although uncommon, some patients undergoing aggressive symptom control measures still have severe suffering from underlying disease or therapy-related adverse effects. In these circumstances, use of PS is considered. Although the goal is to provide relief in an ethically acceptable way to the patient, family, and health care team, health care professionals often voice concerns whether such treatment is necessary or whether such treatment equates to physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. In this review, we frame clinical scenarios in which PS may be considered, summarize the ethical underpinnings of the practice, and further differentiate PS from other forms of end-of-life care, including withholding and/or withdrawing life-sustaining therapy and physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.
机译:姑息镇静(PS)是使用药物来诱导意识降低或缺乏,以减轻生命后期原本难以解决的痛苦。尽管不常见,但一些采取积极的症状控制措施的患者仍然患有潜在疾病或与治疗相关的不良反应。在这种情况下,考虑使用PS。尽管目标是以道德上可接受的方式为患者,家庭和医疗保健团队提供救济,但是医疗保健专业人员经常对这种治疗是否必要或这种治疗是否等同于医生协助的自杀或安乐死表示担忧。在本文中,我们对可能考虑PS的临床情况进行了框架设计,总结了该行为的道德基础,并进一步将PS与其他形式的临终护理区分开来,包括扣留和/或撤回维持生命的疗法和医生。自杀和安乐死。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号