首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal >Spinal cord injury and quality of life: a systematic review of outcome measures
【2h】

Spinal cord injury and quality of life: a systematic review of outcome measures

机译:脊髓损伤和生活质量:对结局指标的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Study design: Systematic review.>Study rationale: According to current estimates, there are more than 1 million people living with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in the United States alone. Given the potentially devastating impact of SCI on health-related quality of life (QoL), we sought to gain an improved understanding of QoL outcomes in SCI.>Objective: To identify and describe common QoL outcomes measures in patients with SCI.>Methods: A systematic review of the English-language literature was undertaken for articles published from 1998 through December 2010. Electronic databases and reference lists of key articles were searched to identify measures or indices used to evaluate QoL outcomes in patients with SCI. The titles and abstracts of the SCI peer-reviewed literature were searched to determine which of these outcome measures were most commonly used to evaluate QoL in patients with SCI.>Results: We identified 27 outcome measures used to evaluate QoL in patients with SCI. In SCI literature, the six most commonly used objective outcome measures were the Short-form 36 (SF-36); Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART); Short-form 12 (SF-12); Sickness Impact Profile (SIP68); Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNL); and Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). The six subjective measures that were most frequently used were the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS); Quality of Life Index (QLI); Life Satisfaction Questionnaire (LISAT-9/-1); World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF scale (WHOQOL-BREF); Perceived Quality of Life (PQOL); and global QoL. All six objective measures have been validated in an SCI population, and four of the six subjective measures have been similarly validated. Three of each of the objective and subjective measures have been reliability tested in a population with SCI.>Conclusion: In addition to neurological and functional changes after SCI, QoL outcomes should be routinely assessed. Choice of appropriate QoL measure should be influenced by the study objectives and design, as well as the psychometric properties of the particular measure within the context of SCI.
机译:>研究设计:系统评价。>研究依据:根据目前的估算,仅在美国,就有超过100万人患有脊髓损伤(SCI)。考虑到SCI对与健康相关的生活质量(QoL)的潜在破坏性影响,我们寻求对SCI中QoL结局有更好的了解。>目的:鉴定和描述患者常见的QoL结局指标>方法:对1998年至2010年12月发表的文章进行了系统的英语文献综述。检索了电子数据库和关键文章的参考文献清单,以确定用于评估的度量或指标SCI患者的QoL结果。搜索SCI同行评审文献的标题和摘要,以确定哪种结果指标最常用于评估SCI患者的QoL。>结果:我们确定了27种用于评估QoL的结果指标在SCI患者中。在SCI文献中,最常用的六种客观结果量度是Short-form 36(SF-36);克雷格障碍评估和报告技术(CHART);简短表格12(SF-12);疾病影响概况(SIP68);重新纳入正常生活指数(RNL);和社区融合问卷(CIQ)。最常用的六种主观衡量标准是生活满意度量表(SWLS);生活质量指数(QLI);生活满意度调查表(LISAT-9 / -1);世界卫生组织生活质量BREF量表(WHOQOL-BREF);感知生活质量(PQOL);和全球QoL。在SCI人群中,所有六项客观指标都得到了验证,而在六种主观指标中,有四项也得到了验证。在SCI人群中,每种客观和主观措施中的三种均已通过可靠性测试。>结论:除了SCI后的神经和功能变化之外,还应常规评估QoL结果。适当的QoL量度的选择应受研究目标和设计以及SCI范围内特定量度的心理测量特性的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号