首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal >Accuracy and reliability of MRI quantitative measurements to assess spinal cord compression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study
【2h】

Accuracy and reliability of MRI quantitative measurements to assess spinal cord compression in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective study

机译:MRI定量测量评估脊髓型颈椎病脊髓压迫的准确性和可靠性:前瞻性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Study type: Reliability study>Introduction: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the most common spinal cord disorder in persons more than 55 years old. Despite multiple neuroimaging approaches proposed to quantify the spinal cord compromise in CSM patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the procedure of choice by providing helpful information for clinical decision making, determining optimal subpopulations for treatment, and selecting the optimal treatment strategies. However, the validity, reliability, and accuracy of the MRI quantitative measurements have not yet been addressed.>Objective: To assess the intra- and inter-observer reliability of MRI quantitative measurements of the spinal cord compromise in CSM patients.>Methods: Seventeen CSM patients (13 male) of mean age 54.5 years old were selected from the AOSpine North America database. The patients had different combinations of stenotic levels (1–4 levels) and the clinical severity (range mJOA baseline: 8–18). Asymptomatic or previous surgically treated CSM, active infection, neoplastic disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, trauma, or concomitant lumbar stenosis were excluded. The patients underwent preoperative MRI using 1.5T (15 patients) and 3T (two patients) scanner, including mid-sagittal T1-weighted, axial and mid-sagittal T2-weighted series. MRI data were analyzed (Mango 2.0 software; Multi-Image Analysis GUI) by four blind raters in three different sessions. Four measurements were analysed: transverse area (TA) (), compression ratio (CR) (), maximal canal compromise (MCC), and maximal spinal cord compression (MSCC) (). The differences for each measurement were evaluated using mixed-effect ANOVA models (ratter, session, ratter x session). The intra- and inter-rater reliability was evaluated with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) (). Transverse area (TA)
机译:>研究类型:可靠性研究>简介:颈椎病脊髓病(CSM)是55岁以上人群中最常见的脊髓疾病。尽管提出了多种神经影像学方法来量化CSM患者的脊髓损伤,但磁共振成像(MRI)仍然是通过提供有用的信息以进行临床决策,确定治疗的最佳亚群以及选择最佳治疗策略的选择程序。但是,MRI定量测量的有效性,可靠性和准确性尚未得到解决。>目的:要评估MRI定量测量对CSM脊髓损伤的MRI观察者之间和观察者之间的可靠性>方法:从AOSpine北美数据库中选择平均年龄54.5岁的17例CSM患者(13例男性)。患者的狭窄程度(1-4级)和临床严重程度(mJOA基线范围:8-18)有不同的组合。无症状或先前手术治疗的CSM,活动性感染,肿瘤疾病,类风湿性关节炎,强直性脊柱炎,外伤或伴有腰椎管狭窄。患者接受1.5T(15例患者)和3T(2例患者)扫描仪进行术前MRI检查,包括中矢状T1加权,轴向和中矢状T2加权系列。四个盲人在三个不同的阶段对MRI数据进行了分析(Mango 2.0软件; Multi-Image Analysis GUI)。分析了四个测量值:横断面积(TA)(),压缩比(CR)(),最大管管折衷(MCC)和最大脊髓压迫(MSCC)()。使用混合效应方差分析模型(实测,会话,棘手x会话)评估每次测量的差异。评估者内部和评估者之间的可靠性通过类内相关系数(ICC)()进行评估。<!-fig ft0-> <!-fig mode = art f1-> <!-caption a7->横向区域(TA)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号