首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping and Cross Taping Application in the Treatment of Latent Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: A Prospective Single-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial
【2h】

Short-Term Effects of Kinesio Taping and Cross Taping Application in the Treatment of Latent Upper Trapezius Trigger Points: A Prospective Single-Blind Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

机译:Kinesio贴带和交叉贴带在短期潜在斜方肌触发点治疗中的近期效果:一项前瞻性单盲随机假对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Kinesio taping (KT) may be a new treatment in patients with myofascial trigger points (MTrPs). A new method available for taping practitioners is cross taping (CT). The main objective was to determine how CT, KT, and medical adhesive tape (sham group) affect the subjective assessment of resting bioelectrical activity and pain of the upper trapezius muscle (UT) in patients with MTrPs. 105 volunteers were recruited to participate. The primary outcome was resting bioelectrical activity of UT muscle as assessed by surface electromyography (sEMG) in each group and pain intensity on a visual analog scale (VAS). Assessments were collected before and after intervention and after the 24-hours follow-up. No significant differences were observed in bioelectrical activity of UT between pre-, post-, and follow-up results. In three groups patients had significantly lower pain VAS score after the intervention (CT—p < 0.001, KT—p < 0.001, and sham—p < 0.01). The Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA showed no significant differences in almost all measurements between groups. The application of all three types of tapes does not influence the resting bioelectrical activity of UT muscle and may not lead to a reduction in muscle tone in the case of MTrPs.
机译:Kinesio Taping(KT)可能是肌筋膜触发点(MTrPs)患者的一种新疗法。编带从业人员可用的新方法是交叉编带(CT)。主要目的是确定CT,KT和医用胶带(假手术组)如何影响MTrPs患者的静息生物电活动和上斜方肌(UT)疼痛的主观评估。招募了105名志愿者参加。主要结果是通过每组的表面肌电图(sEMG)评估UT肌肉的静息生物电活动,并以视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估疼痛强度。在干预前后,24小时随访后收集评估。在前后的结果之间,UT的生物电活性没有观察到显着差异。在三组患者中,干预后的疼痛VAS评分显着降低(CT-p <0.001,KT-p <0.001和假手术-p <0.01)。 Kruskal-Wallis方差分析显示各组之间几乎所有测量均无显着差异。所有三种类型的胶带的使用均不会影响UT肌肉的静息生物电活动,在MTrP的情况下,可能不会导致肌肉张力降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号