首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neurology >Comparison of Therapy Practice at Home and in the Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis of the Constant Therapy Platform Data Set
【2h】

Comparison of Therapy Practice at Home and in the Clinic: A Retrospective Analysis of the Constant Therapy Platform Data Set

机译:国内外治疗实践的比较:恒定治疗平台数据集的回顾性分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Computer-based therapies can provide an affordable and practical alternative by providing frequent intervention for stroke survivors with chronic aphasia by allowing the opportunity for home exercise practice, however more evidence is needed. The goal of this retrospective analysis was to compare the time course of therapy engagement when therapy was targeted in the clinic or at home by post-stroke individuals. We examined if home users of the therapy were compliant in therapy and if this documented practice time was associated with improved outcomes similar to clinic patients who practiced under the guidance of a clinician.>Methods: A retrospective analysis of anonymously aggregated data collected for 3,686 patients with post-stroke aphasia over the course of four years (2013–2017) was conducted. Participants either received therapy delivered through Constant Therapy only at home (N = 2,100) or only in the clinic (N = 1,577). Constant Therapy includes over 70 evidence-based therapies for language and cognitive skills. This program was individualized for each patient with targeted tasks that dynamically adapted to each individual's progress.>Results: Patients with <60% accuracy were analyzed to determine how long it took them to reach >90% accuracy. Results showed that both home-therapy and clinic patients reached 90% accuracy on their tasks similarly (Median = 3 sessions), but the frequency of therapy was significantly different with 50% of home users receiving therapy at least every 2 days while 50% of clinic patients only had therapy once every 5 days (p < 0.001). Thus, home-therapy users were able to master tasks in a shorter time (median of 6 days) than clinic patients (median of 12 days) (p < 0.001).>Conclusion: Outcomes of treatment are similar for home users and clinic patients indicating the potential usability of a home-based treatment program for rehabilitation for post-stroke aphasia.
机译:>背景:基于计算机的疗法可通过允许家庭锻炼的机会,对患有慢性失语症的中风幸存者进行频繁干预,从而提供一种负担得起且实用的替代方法,但是需要更多的证据。这项回顾性分析的目的是比较中风后个体在诊所或在家中进行治疗时的治疗参与时间。我们检查了该疗法的家庭用户是否符合疗法,并且记录的练习时间是否与临床医生指导下的临床患者类似的改善结局相关。>方法:匿名回顾性分析在四年(2013-2017年)的过程中,收集了3686例中风后失语症患者的汇总数据。参与者仅在家里(N = 2,100)或仅在诊所(N = 1,577)接受通过恒定疗法进行的治疗。持续疗法包括70多种基于语言和认知技能的循证疗法。该程序针对每位患者进行个性化设置,其目标任务可以动态地适应每个人的进度。>结果:分析了准确率<60%的患者,确定他们需要多长时间才能达到90%以上的准确率。结果显示,家庭治疗和临床患者均达到了90%的准确度(中位数= 3次疗程),但是治疗频率显着不同,其中至少50%的家庭用户每两天接受一次治疗,而50%的家庭用户临床患者每5天仅接受一次治疗(p <0.001)。因此,家庭疗法使用者比临床病人(中位数为12天)能够在更短的时间内(中位数为6天)完成任务(p <0.001)。>结论:治疗结果相似适用于家庭用户和临床患者,表明基于家庭的治疗计划可用于中风后失语症的康复治疗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号