首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Musicians Are Better than Non-musicians in Frequency Change Detection: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence
【2h】

Musicians Are Better than Non-musicians in Frequency Change Detection: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence

机译:在频率变化检测方面音乐家比非音乐家更好:行为和电生理证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective: The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine if musicians have a better ability to detect frequency changes under quiet and noisy conditions; (2) to use the acoustic change complex (ACC), a type of electroencephalographic (EEG) response, to understand the neural substrates of musician vs. non-musician difference in frequency change detection abilities.>Methods: Twenty-four young normal hearing listeners (12 musicians and 12 non-musicians) participated. All participants underwent psychoacoustic frequency detection tests with three types of stimuli: tones (base frequency at 160 Hz) containing frequency changes (Stim 1), tones containing frequency changes masked by low-level noise (Stim 2), and tones containing frequency changes masked by high-level noise (Stim 3). The EEG data were recorded using tones (base frequency at 160 and 1200 Hz, respectively) containing different magnitudes of frequency changes (0, 5, and 50% changes, respectively). The late-latency evoked potential evoked by the onset of the tones (onset LAEP or N1-P2 complex) and that evoked by the frequency change contained in the tone (the acoustic change complex or ACC or N1′-P2′ complex) were analyzed.>Results: Musicians significantly outperformed non-musicians in all stimulus conditions. The ACC and onset LAEP showed similarities and differences. Increasing the magnitude of frequency change resulted in increased ACC amplitudes. ACC measures were found to be significantly different between musicians (larger P2′ amplitude) and non-musicians for the base frequency of 160 Hz but not 1200 Hz. Although the peak amplitude in the onset LAEP appeared to be larger and latency shorter in musicians than in non-musicians, the difference did not reach statistical significance. The amplitude of the onset LAEP is significantly correlated with that of the ACC for the base frequency of 160 Hz.>Conclusion: The present study demonstrated that musicians do perform better than non-musicians in detecting frequency changes in quiet and noisy conditions. The ACC and onset LAEP may involve different but overlapping neural mechanisms.>Significance: This is the first study using the ACC to examine music-training effects. The ACC measures provide an objective tool for documenting musical training effects on frequency detection.
机译:>目的:该研究的目的是:(1)确定音乐家在安静和嘈杂的条件下是否具有更好的检测频率变化的能力; (2)使用声学变化复合体(ACC),一种脑电图(EEG)响应,以了解音乐家与非音乐家的频率变化检测能力差异的神经底质。>方法:二十四名年轻的正常听力收听者(12名音乐家和12名非音乐家)参加了会议。所有参加者都接受了三种类型的刺激的心理声学频率检测测试:包含频率变化(音调1)的音调(160 Hz的基本频率),包含低级噪声掩盖的频率变化的音调(刺激2)和包含被掩盖的频率变化的音调受到高水平的噪音(音色3)。使用包含不同幅度的频率变化(分别为0、5和50%变化)的音调(分别为160和1200 Hz的基本频率)记录EEG数据。分析了由音调的发作(发作的LAEP或N1-P2复合体)和音调中包含的频率变化(声学变化的复合体或ACC或N1'-P2'的复合体)引起的延迟潜伏期诱发电位。 。>结果:在所有刺激条件下,音乐家的表现均明显优于非音乐家。 ACC和发作性LAEP表现出异同。频率变化幅度的增加导致ACC幅度增加。对于基准频率为160 Hz而不是1200 Hz的音乐人(较大的P2'幅度)和非音乐人,ACC措施存在显着差异。尽管与非音乐家相比,音乐家中起病期LAEP的峰值幅度似乎更大,潜伏期较短,但差异并未达到统计学意义。在基础频率为160 Hz时,LAEP发作的幅度与ACC的幅度显着相关。>结论:本研究表明,音乐家在安静环境下检测频率变化的表现要好于非音乐家。和嘈杂的条件。 ACC和发作性LAEP可能涉及不同但重叠的神经机制。>意义:这是首次使用ACC检验音乐训练效果的研究。 ACC措施为记录音乐训练对频率检测的效果提供了客观的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号