首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Pros and Cons of Using the Informed Basis Set to Account for Hemodynamic Response Variability with Developmental Data
【2h】

Pros and Cons of Using the Informed Basis Set to Account for Hemodynamic Response Variability with Developmental Data

机译:使用信息基础集解决发展数据对血流动力学反应变异性的利弊

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conventional analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data using the general linear model (GLM) employs a neural model convolved with a canonical hemodynamic response function (HRF) peaking 5 s after stimulation. Incorporation of a further basis function, namely the canonical HRF temporal derivative, accounts for delays in the hemodynamic response to neural activity. A population that may benefit from this flexible approach is children whose hemodynamic response is not yet mature. Here, we examined the effects of using the set based on the canonical HRF plus its temporal derivative on both first- and second-level GLM analyses, through simulations and using developmental data (an fMRI dataset on proprioceptive mapping in children and adults). Simulations of delayed fMRI first-level data emphasized the benefit of carrying forward to the second-level a derivative boost that combines derivative and nonderivative beta estimates. In the experimental data, second-level analysis using a paired t-test showed increased mean amplitude estimate (i.e., increased group contrast mean) in several brain regions related to proprioceptive processing when using the derivative boost compared to using only the nonderivative term. This was true especially in children. However, carrying forward to the second-level the individual derivative boosts had adverse consequences on random-effects analysis that implemented one-sample t-test, yielding increased between-subject variance, thus affecting group-level statistic. Boosted data also presented a lower level of smoothness that had implication for the detection of group average activation. Imposing soft constraints on the derivative boost by limiting the time-to-peak range of the modeled response within a specified range (i.e., 4–6 s) mitigated these issues. These findings support the notion that there are pros and cons to using the informed basis set with developmental data.
机译:使用通用线性模型(GLM)进行的功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)数据的常规分析采用的神经模型卷积了刺激后5 s达到峰值的典型血液动力学响应函数(HRF)。纳入进一步的基础功能,即规范的HRF时间导数,可解释对神经活动的血液动力学反应的延迟。可能受益于这种灵活方法的人群是血液动力学反应尚未成熟的儿童。在这里,我们通过模拟和使用发展数据(关于儿童和成人本体感受作图的fMRI数据集),研究了使用基于经典HRF及其时间导数的集合对第一级和第二级GLM分析的影响。延迟fMRI一级数据的模拟强调了将二级衍生推导结合到二级的优势,该推导结合了导数和非导数beta估计值。在实验数据中,使用配对t检验的二级分析显示,与仅使用非导数项相比,使用导数增强时,在与本体感受处理相关的多个大脑区域中,平均幅度估计值增加(即组对比平均值增加)。尤其是在儿童中,这是正确的。但是,将个体导数提升到第二级会对实施单样本t检验的随机效应分析产生不利影响,从而增加受试者之间的方差,从而影响组一级的统计量。增强的数据还显示出较低的平滑度,这对检测组平均激活具有影响。通过将建模响应的峰值时间范围限制在指定范围内(即4-6 s),对导数增强施加软约束可以缓解这些问题。这些发现支持这样的观点,即使用具有发展数据的知情基础集是有利有弊的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号