首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Medical History >The ‘Compleat Physician’ and Experimentation in Medicines: Everard Maynwaring (c.1629–1713) and the Restoration Debate on Medical Practice in London
【2h】

The ‘Compleat Physician’ and Experimentation in Medicines: Everard Maynwaring (c.1629–1713) and the Restoration Debate on Medical Practice in London

机译:医学的综合医师和实验:Everard Maynwaring(c.1629–1713)和伦敦关于医疗实践的恢复辩论

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Restoration London saw a wave of publications by physicians advocating that the ‘compleat physician’ should be one who experimented and produced his own medicines. Only thus, they argued, could the medical hierarchy be restored and medical authority re-established on a defensible basis. This article seeks to explain the context for this unusual approach, and why it failed to attract mainstream physicians by the end of the century, by considering the sixty-year career of one of its leading advocates, Everard Maynwaring (c.1629–1713), a prolific medical author, and what his own failure to enter the medical establishment may show about the problems inherent in this model for the physician. A university-trained gentleman physician who converted to chymical medicine c.1660, Maynwaring published learned and relatively unpolemical texts to persuade both medical and lay audiences of the superiority of experimental medicine as a mode of learned practice, yet could not easily reconcile this with the advocacy and sale of his own chymical medicines (especially as he focused increasingly on a small group of ‘universal medicines’) without being branded an ‘empirick’. Fragmentary evidence regarding his career suggests he became increasingly marginalised, and as an old man was reduced to advertising his cures like the ‘empiricks’ from whom he had sought to distance both himself and physicians in general.
机译:伦敦复兴运动引起了一系列医生的拥护,主张“完全医师”应该是进行实验并生产自己的药物的医生。他们认为,只有这样,才能恢复医疗体系并在可辩护的基础上重新建立医疗机构。本文试图通过考虑其主要倡导者之一Everard Maynwaring(c.1629–1713)的60年职业生涯,来解释这种非同寻常的方法的背景,以及为什么它未能在本世纪末吸引主流医生。 ,一位多产的医学作者,以及他自己未能进入医学机构的原因,可能会显示出该模型对于医生而言固有的问题。 Maynwaring是一位受过大学教育的绅士医师,他在1660年左右转换为糜烂医学,他发表了有学识的和相对无争议的文章,以说服医学界和普通大众说服实验医学作为一种有学问的实践模式,但是却不能轻易将其与倡导和销售自己的食糜药物(尤其是当他越来越专注于一小群“通用药物”时)而没有被冠以“ empirick”的烙印。关于他的职业的零碎证据表明,他变得越来越边缘化,而随着一位老人沦为广告来宣传自己的疗法,例如他试图与自己和医生保持距离的“ empiricks”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号