首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>GMS Journal for Medical Education >Evaluation of the current status of Rehabilitation Physical Medicine and Naturopathy education 10 years after the reform of the Medical Licensure Act – a nationwide survey of German Medical Universities
【2h】

Evaluation of the current status of Rehabilitation Physical Medicine and Naturopathy education 10 years after the reform of the Medical Licensure Act – a nationwide survey of German Medical Universities

机译:医疗许可法改革十年后对康复物理医学和自然疗法教育现状的评估–德国医学大学的全国性调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: After the reform of the German Medical Licensure Act of 2003, Rehabilitation, Naturopathy and Physical Medicine were integrated into one discipline to be taught in Medical University. The aim of this survey is to determine the outcome of this change by evaluating the current status of education of these three disciplines based on the experience and satisfaction reported by lecturers responsible for teaching these subjects to medical students. >Methods: A questionnaire-based survey. A paper version of the questionnaire for each discipline was posted to each Medical University in Germany. The first part asked about the current status of teaching; the second part asked about facilities and requirements; the third part asked respondents to give information on their career and teaching experience in this subject>Results: The response rate was 51.5% for Rehabilitation, 48.5% for Physical Medicine and 60.6% for Naturopathy. A vast range of people and faculties were involved in the curricula. The percentage of each discipline taught was unevenly distributed: the major proportion being rehabilitation (38%), then naturopathy 34% lastly physical medicine with less than a third (28%). The main delivery of these disciplines was through lectures in plenary sessions. Modern teaching methods were not in evidence. Lecturers were generally pleased to be working with the combination of the three disciplines. >Conclusion: Future medical education should improve upon teaching coordination and aim towards a common curriculum for these three disciplines. Expected future changes to medical curricula will provide opportunities to improve the implementation of Rehabilitation, Physical Medicine and Naturopathy in teaching and research.
机译:>简介:在2003年德国《医疗许可法》改革之后,康复,自然疗法和物理医学被整合为一门要在医科大学教授的学科。这项调查的目的是根据负责向医学生教授这些学科的讲师报告的经验和满意度,通过评估这三个学科的教育现状来确定这种变化的结果。 >方法:基于问卷的调查。每个学科的问卷的纸质版本已发布到德国的每一所医科大学。第一部分询问有关教学的现状;第二部分询问设施和要求;第三部分要求受访者提供有关此学科的职业和教学经验的信息。>结果::康复治疗的回应率为51.5%,物理医学的回应率为48.5%,自然疗法的回应率为60.6%。该课程涉及大量人员和教职员工。每个学科所教授的比例分布不均:主要比例是康复(38%),自然疗法占34%,最后是物理医学,少于三分之一(28%)。这些学科的主要讲授是通过全体会议的讲座。现代教学方法没有证据。讲师通常很高兴将这三个学科结合在一起。 >结论:未来的医学教育应改善教学协调性,并针对这三个学科制定共同的课程。预期医学课程的未来变化将为改善康复,物理医学和自然疗法在教学和研究中的实施提供机会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号