首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hand (New York N.Y.) >A Preliminary Assessment of the Utility of Large-Caliber Processed Nerve Allografts for the Repair of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries
【2h】

A Preliminary Assessment of the Utility of Large-Caliber Processed Nerve Allografts for the Repair of Upper Extremity Nerve Injuries

机译:大口径神经同种异体移植修复上肢神经损伤的效用的初步评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Cabled sensory nerve autografts are the historical gold standard for overcoming gaps in larger diameter nerves as repair utilizing large-diameter autograft risks central graft necrosis. Commercially available processed nerve allograft (PNA) is available in diameters up to 5 mm but represents an acellular 3-dimensional matrix as opposed to viable tissue. The purpose of this study is to specifically evaluate whether similar concerns regarding the use of large-caliber PNA are warranted. >Methods: The RANGER Registry is an active database designed to collect injury, repair, safety, and outcomes data for PNAs (Avance® Nerve Graft; AxoGen, Inc, Alachua, Florida) according to an institutional review board–approved protocol. The database was queried for patients presenting with large-caliber nerve allograft repairs in the upper extremity. Identified patients reporting quantitative outcomes with a minimum of 9-month follow-up were included in the data set. >Results: The large-caliber PNA subgroup included 13 patients with 15 injuries. The mean ± SD age was 36 ± 22 years. Large-caliber single-stranded repairs included twelve 4- to 5-mm-diameter grafts. Large-caliber cabled repairs included the combined use of 3- to 4-mm and 4- to 5-mm-diameter nerve allografts in 3 repairs. The mean nerve gap was 33 ± 10 mm with a mean follow-up time of 13 months. Available quantitative data reported meaningful recovery of sensory and motor function in 67% and 85% of the repairs, respectively. >Conclusion: Although based on a small subset of patients, PNAs of up to 5 mm in diameter appear capable of supporting successful nerve regeneration.
机译:>背景:电缆状的感觉神经自体移植术是克服大直径神经间隙的历史性金标准,因为利用大直径自体移植术进行修复可能会导致中央移植物坏死。市售的经处理的神经同种异体移植物(PNA)的直径最大为5 mm,但代表了无细胞的3维矩阵,而不是可行的组织。这项研究的目的是专门评估是否需要考虑使用大口径PNA的类似问题。 >方法: RANGER Registry是一个活动数据库,旨在根据机构审查委员会收集PNA(Avance®Nerve Graft; AxoGen,Inc,佛罗里达州阿拉卡瓦)的伤害,维修,安全和结果数据–批准的协议。查询该数据库中上肢大口径神经异体移植修复的患者。数据集包括已报告定量结果且至少随访9个月的患者。 >结果:大口径的PNA亚组包括13例15伤的患者。平均±SD年龄为36±22岁。大口径的单链修复包括十二个直径为4至5毫米的移植物。大口径有线修复包括3次修复中直径3至4毫米和4至5毫米神经异体移植的组合使用。平均神经间隙为33±10 mm,平均随访时间为13个月。现有的定量数据表明,分别在67%和85%的修复中感觉和运动功能得到了有意义的恢复。 >结论:尽管基于一小部分患者,直径达5毫米的PNA似乎能够支持成功的神经再生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号