首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Hand (New York N.Y.) >Biomechanical Comparison of Suture-Button Suspensionplasty and LRTI for Basilar Thumb Arthritis
【2h】

Biomechanical Comparison of Suture-Button Suspensionplasty and LRTI for Basilar Thumb Arthritis

机译:缝纽扣悬吊成形术和LRTI治疗基底性拇指关节炎的生物力学比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the initial biomechanical strength of trapeziectomy and suture-button suspensionplasty (SBS) with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) for thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis in a cadaveric model. >Methods: Eight matched pairs of below-elbow cadaveric arms were used for this study. Each specimen was randomly assigned to either receive a trapeziectomy and LRTI (LRTI group) or trapeziectomy and SBS (SBS group). Using previously described and validated testing protocols, physiological key pinch was simulated. The thumb metacarpal was then incrementally loaded from 5 to 20 lbs, using 5-lb increments. Metacarpal subsidence during physiological key pinch and incremental loading was determined using radiographic measurements of trapezial space height. >Results: The average pretesting trapezial space height did not differ significantly between the LRTI (11.9 mm) and SBS (13.7 mm) groups. After simulated physiological key pinch, the SBS group had significantly greater average trapezial space height compared with the LRTI group (8.0 mm vs 5.5 mm). For each incremental metacarpal load from 5 to 20 lbs, the SBS group had significantly greater average trapezial space height than the LRTI group. >Conclusions: In a cadaveric model, SBS demonstrates greater resistance to metacarpal subsidence with immediate loading compared with LRTI.
机译:>背景:本研究的目的是比较梯形切除术和缝合纽扣悬吊成形术(SBS)以及韧带重建和腱插入术(LRTI)用于尸体腕掌骨(CMC)关节炎的初始生物力学强度。模型。 >方法:本研究使用了八对匹配的肘下尸体。每个标本被随机分配接受梯形切除术和LRTI(LRTI组)或梯形切除术和SBS(SBS组)。使用先前描述和验证的测试协议,对生理性捏捏进行了模拟。然后以5磅的增量将拇指掌骨从5磅增加到20磅。生理学关键捏和增量负荷过程中的掌骨下陷是使用射线照相法测量的梯形空间高度来确定的。 >结果: LRTI(11.9 mm)和SBS(13.7 mm)组之间的平均预测试梯形间隙高度没有显着差异。经过模拟的生理学捏合后,SBS组的平均梯形间隙高度明显高于LRTI组(8.0毫米对5.5毫米)。对于从5到20 lbs的每一个增加的掌骨负荷,SBS组的平均梯形间隙高度明显高于LRTI组。 >结论:在尸体模型中,与LRTI相比,SBS在立即加载时表现出对掌骨沉陷的更大抵抗力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号