首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Gut >A prospective trial of endoscopic sclerotherapy v oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation in the long term management of bleeding oesophageal varices.
【2h】

A prospective trial of endoscopic sclerotherapy v oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation in the long term management of bleeding oesophageal varices.

机译:内镜硬化治疗食管横断和胃血运重建在食管静脉曲张破裂出血的长期治疗中的一项前瞻性试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In a prospective three centre study oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation have been compared with endoscopic sclerotherapy in the long term management of bleeding oesophageal varices. Cirrhotic patients (Child's A or B grade) with documented bleeding oesophageal varices were treated initially with emergency sclerotherapy, and after five days stability, were allocated to one of the two treatment regimes. The endoscopic sclerotherapy group underwent regular sclerotherapy until variceal obliteration while those undergoing surgery were not endoscoped unless bleeding recurred, when they were treated by sclerotherapy if appropriate. Ninety two patients were eligible for analysis (68% alcoholic cirrhosis; mean age 50.1 years) and follow up was achieved for a mean of 52.5 months (range 17-83). Mortality in the first three months was greater in the oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation group (20% v 1%) but by two years the survival curves were the same and thereafter there was no difference in mortality. Rebleeding occurred in 13/41 (31%) patients, undergoing oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation. The costs incurred during the first year of oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation treatment were significantly greater than with endoscopic sclerotherapy (4369 pounds v 1067 pounds, p < 0.0001) and the high rate of rebleeding in the surgical group meant that no cost savings occurred in subsequent years. It is concluded that oesophageal transection and gastric devascularisation confers no benefit over endoscopic sclerotherapy in terms of long term survival and that it is not cost effective as judged by the current health care costs in the United Kingdom.
机译:在一项前瞻性三中心研究中,在长期处理食管静脉曲张破裂出血方面,已将食管横切术和胃血运重建术与内窥镜硬化疗法进行了比较。记录有食道静脉曲张破裂出血的肝硬化患者(儿童A级或B级)最初接受紧急硬化疗法治疗,五天稳定后被分配为两种治疗方案之一。内窥镜硬化治疗组定期进行硬化治疗,直到静脉曲张消失为止,而接受手术治疗的患者除非有再次出血的情况,否则在不进行内窥镜检查的情况下进行硬化治疗。有92例患者符合分析条件(68%的酒精性肝硬化;平均年龄50.1岁),平均随访52.5个月(范围17-83)。食管横断和胃血运重建组的前三个月死亡率较高(20%vs 1%),但到两年生存曲线相同,此后死亡率无差异。 13/41(31%)的患者在进行食管横切和胃血运重建术时发生了再出血。食道横切和胃血运重建治疗第一年的费用明显高于内窥镜硬化疗法(4369磅vs 1067磅,p <0.0001),并且手术组再出血率高,这意味着随后的手术没有节省费用年份。结论是,就长期生存而言,食道横切术和胃血运重建术与内窥镜硬化疗法相比没有任何益处,而且根据英国目前的医疗保健费用判断,其成本效益不高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号