首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Healthcare >Identifying Malnutrition in an Elderly Ambulatory Rehabilitation Population: Agreement between Mini Nutritional Assessment and Validated Screening Tools
【2h】

Identifying Malnutrition in an Elderly Ambulatory Rehabilitation Population: Agreement between Mini Nutritional Assessment and Validated Screening Tools

机译:识别老年人门诊康复人群的营养不良:迷你营养评估和经过验证的筛查工具之间的协议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Malnutrition is common in older adults and often goes unrecognised and untreated. Australian evidence-based guidelines for the management of malnutrition indicate that only the Mini Nutritional Assessment short form (MNA-sf) and Rapid Screen are recommended for use as malnutrition screening tools in the rehabilitation setting. The aim of this secondary analysis was to assess the validity and reliability of two malnutrition screening tools, validated in other adult sub-groups, in a rehabilitation population aged ≥60 years. The Council on Nutrition Appetite Questionnaire (CNAQ) and the Simplified Nutritional Appetite Questionnaire (SNAQ), were completed by 185 ambulatory rehabilitation patients (48% male; median age 78 years) and results compared to the full MNA as a reference technique. Prevalence of risk of malnutrition was 63% according to the MNA. For identification of risk of malnutrition the CNAQ had sensitivity of 54%, specificity 81%, positive predictive value 83% and negative predictive value 51%, compared to 28%, 94%, 89% and 44%, respectively, using SNAQ. Assessment of reliability indicated significant slight to fair agreement between MNA with CNAQ (κ = 0.309, p < 0.001) and SNAQ (κ = 0.176, p < 0.001). Neither the CNAQ nor the SNAQ have a high level of validity or reliability in this elderly population and are therefore not recommended for use in the ambulatory rehabilitation setting. Further work is necessary to assess the validity and reliability of other malnutrition screening tools to establish their usefulness in this population.
机译:营养不良在老年人中很常见,并且常常得不到承认和治疗。澳大利亚基于证据的营养不良管理指南表明,仅建议将迷你营养评估简写(MNA-sf)和快速筛查用作康复环境中的营养不良筛查工具。这项次要分析的目的是评估≥60岁的康复人群中两种在其他成人亚组中验证过的营养不良筛查工具的有效性和可靠性。营养食欲调查表理事会(CNAQ)和简化营养食欲调查表(SNAQ)由185名非卧床康复患者(48%男性;中位年龄78岁)完成,其结果与完整的MNA作参考技术进行了比较。根据MNA,营养不良风险的患病率为63%。为了确定营养不良的风险,CNAQ的敏感性为54%,特异性为81%,阳性预测值为83%,阴性预测值为51%,而使用SNAQ的敏感性分别为28%,94%,89%和44%。可靠性评估表明,MNA与CNAQ(κ= 0.309,p <0.001)和SNAQ(κ= 0.176,p <0.001)之间存在显着的轻微至公平的一致性。 CNAQ和SNAQ在这个老年人群中都没有很高的有效性或可靠性,因此不建议在门诊康复环境中使用。需要进一步的工作来评估其他营养不良筛查工具的有效性和可靠性,以建立其在这一人群中的有用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号