首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine >Analysis of Difference in Center-of-Pressure Positions Between Experts and Novices During Asymmetric Lifting
【2h】

Analysis of Difference in Center-of-Pressure Positions Between Experts and Novices During Asymmetric Lifting

机译:非对称举升过程中专家与新手之间的压力中心位置差异分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although numerous studies have analyzed the relationship between manual material handling (MMH) and the forces acting on the lumbar spine, the difference in the MMH between experts and novices through the analysis of measured data has not been well studied. The purpose of this paper was to analyze the difference in the MMH positions between ten skilled experts working at a freight transport company (Group 1) and five unskilled novices without any experience (Group 2) during asymmetric lifting. All the human subjects performed asymmetric lifting experiments with closed eyes; the experiments involved moving loads (6 and 18 kg) to the left side. Time series data of the vertical ground reaction force were measured, using a Wii Balance Board, and then, the center-of-pressure (CoP) trajectories were calculated. The balance board was used for the measurement, because it was reliable, inexpensive, and portable and provided good repeatability even on rough surfaces, and all the information pertaining to the load and worker under various conditions was captured without any omissions. Under the 18 kg load condition, the CoP positions for Group 2 were located on the same side during left asymmetric lifting; however, those for Group 1 were located on the opposite side during left asymmetric lifting (). Furthermore, under the 6 kg load condition, the load weight influenced asymmetric lifting for most subjects of Group 2 such that the CoP positions were located on the opposite side (). Based on the simulation and electromyography measurement results, we inferred that the difference in the CoP positions between the two different groups could be attributed to the difference in the hip positions. Most skilled experts position their hips in such a way that their CoP trajectories move toward the opposite side during left asymmetric lifting. Although the skillful characteristics of experts may be responsible for the lightening of the burden on the waist during asymmetric lifting, there are still two points that this paper does not clarify: the relationship between the experts’ adjustment of the hip position and the load of the weight, and the influence of an imbalance of the CoP position on the forces acting on the lumbar spine.
机译:尽管许多研究已经分析了手工物料搬运(MMH)与作用在腰椎上的力之间的关系,但是通过对实测数据的分析,专家和新手之间的MMH差异还没有得到很好的研究。本文的目的是分析在货运公司工作的10名熟练专家(第1组)与5名无经验的新手(第2组)在非对称提升过程中MMH职位的差异。所有人类受试者都闭着眼睛进行了不对称举升实验;实验涉及将负载(6公斤和18公斤)移至左侧。使用Wii平衡板测量垂直地面反作用力的时间序列数据,然后计算压力中心(CoP)轨迹。平衡板用于测量,是因为它可靠,便宜且便携,即使在粗糙的表面上也能提供良好的可重复性,并且在各种条件下均能捕获与负载和工人有关的所有信息。在18 kg的负载条件下,第2组的CoP位置在左非对称举升过程中位于同一侧。但是,第1组的对象在左非对称提升过程中位于另一侧()。此外,在6 kg的负载条件下,负载重量影响了第2组大多数对象的不对称提升,因此CoP位置位于相对侧()。基于模拟和肌电图测量结果,我们推断两组之间CoP位置的差异可能归因于髋部位置的差异。最熟练的专家将臀部定位,以使其CoP轨迹在左非对称举升过程中朝相反的方向移动。尽管专家的熟练特性可能是减轻不对称举起过程中腰部负担的原因,但本文仍未阐明两点:专家调整髋部位置与髋关节负重之间的关系。重量,以及CoP位置不平衡对作用在腰椎上的力的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号