首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Implementation Science : IS >Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series
【2h】

Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series

机译:将GRADE-CERQual应用于定性证据综合发现:该系列简介

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The GRADE-CERQual (‘Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research’) approach provides guidance for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from systematic reviews of qualitative research (or qualitative evidence syntheses). The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. Confidence in the evidence from qualitative evidence syntheses is an assessment of the extent to which a review finding is a reasonable representation of the phenomenon of interest. CERQual provides a systematic and transparent framework for assessing confidence in individual review findings, based on consideration of four components: (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data, and (4) relevance. A fifth component, dissemination (or publication) bias, may also be important and is being explored. As with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach for effectiveness evidence, CERQual suggests summarising evidence in succinct, transparent, and informative Summary of Qualitative Findings tables. These tables are designed to communicate the review findings and the CERQual assessment of confidence in each finding. This article is the first of a seven-part series providing guidance on how to apply the CERQual approach. In this paper, we describe the rationale and conceptual basis for CERQual, the aims of the approach, how the approach was developed, and its main components. We also outline the purpose and structure of this series and discuss the growing role for qualitative evidence in decision-making. Papers 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 in this series discuss each CERQual component, including the rationale for including the component in the approach, how the component is conceptualised, and how it should be assessed. Paper 2 discusses how to make an overall assessment of confidence in a review finding and how to create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. The series is intended primarily for those undertaking qualitative evidence syntheses or using their findings in decision-making processes but is also relevant to guideline development agencies, primary qualitative researchers, and implementation scientists and practitioners.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:GRADE-CERQual(“定性研究评论中的证据的置信度”)方法为评估对定性研究(或定性证据合成)进行系统评价时对结果的置信度提供了指导。已经开发出这种方法来支持定性证据综合研究结果在决策中的使用,包括指南制定和政策制定。来自定性证据综合的证据的可信度是对评价结果合理表示感兴趣现象的程度的评估。 CERQual基于以下四个方面的考虑,提供了一个系统透明的框架,用于评估对单个审阅结果的信心:(1)方法学局限性,(2)连贯性,(3)数据充分性和(4)相关性。第五个成分,即传播(或出版)偏见也可能很重要,并且正在探索中。与有效性证据的GRADE(建议分级,评估和评估)方法一样,CERQual建议在简洁明了,透明且内容丰富的“定性结果摘要”表中总结证据。这些表旨在传达审核结果和CERQual对每个结果的信心评估。本文是由七个部分组成的系列文章的第一篇,该系列文章提供了有关如何应用CERQual方法的指南。在本文中,我们描述了CERQual的基本原理和概念基础,方法的目的,方法的开发方法及其主要组成部分。我们还概述了本系列的目的和结构,并讨论了定性证据在决策中的日益重要的作用。该系列的第3、4、5、6和7号论文讨论了CERQual的每个组成部分,包括在方法中包括该组成部分的理由,如何对该组成部分进行概念化以及如何对其进行评估。论文2讨论了如何对评论结果的信心进行整体评估,以及如何创建“定性结果摘要”表。该系列主要供那些进行定性证据合成或在决策过程中使用其发现的人员使用,但也与准则制定机构,主要定性研究人员以及实施科学家和从业人员有关。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1186 / s13012-017-0688-3)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号