首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Indian Heart Journal >Are e-cigarettes beneficial for public health: Humes guillotine – The debate continues?
【2h】

Are e-cigarettes beneficial for public health: Humes guillotine – The debate continues?

机译:电子烟是否有益于公共卫生:休姆的断头台–辩论仍在继续吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Cigarette smoking is the most common preventable cause of death which has led to a search for healthier alternatives to tobacco smoke. Electronic cigarettes are devoid of many harmful constituents found in cigarette smoke and are therefore being positioned as safer alternative to tobacco smoke. The carcinogenic potential may be of lower magnitude compared with cigarette smoke, but it is still there. The use of e-cigarettes, however, is fairly new, so its long-term effects are still unknown. Moreover, they continue to posses the cardiovascular side-effects and are certainly as addicting. Thus on one hand while their substitution could lead to reduction of some side-effects of tobacco smoke, its use may be just shifting the modality of addiction and will be unlikely to lead to total abstinence from tobacco products. On the other hand there is a fear that its use could lead to loosening of the taboo currently associated with use of tobacco products and so the benefits of years of advocacy to ban tobacco products might be lost. Thus currently the scientific community is divided about role of e-cigarettes.
机译:抽烟是最常见的可预防的死亡原因,导致人们寻找更健康的烟草烟雾替代品。电子香烟不含香烟烟雾中发现的许多有害成分,因此被定位为替代烟草烟雾的更安全的替代品。与香烟烟雾相比,其致癌潜力可能较低,但仍然存在。但是,电子烟的使用还很新,因此其长期影响仍然未知。而且,他们继续具有心血管副作用,而且肯定会上瘾。因此,一方面,尽管它们的替代可以减少烟草烟雾的某些副作用,但其使用可能只是在改变成瘾的方式,并且不太可能导致烟草制品的完全戒断。另一方面,人们担心使用它可能会导致目前与烟草制品使用有关的禁忌得到放松,因此多年来倡导禁止烟草制品的利益可能会丧失。因此,目前科学界对电子烟的作用存在分歧。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号