首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials—A Laboratory Peel-off Study
【2h】

Compatibility of a Silicone Impression/Adhesive System to FDM-Printed Tray Materials—A Laboratory Peel-off Study

机译:硅酮印模/胶粘剂系统与FDM打印纸盘材料的兼容性-实验室剥离研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Computer-aided design (CAD) and additive manufacturing (AM) have shown promise in facilitating the fabrication of custom trays. Due to the clinical requirements, custom tray materials should achieve good bonding to the impression/adhesive systems. This study evaluated the retention of three fused deposition modeling (FDM) custom tray materials to a silicone impression/adhesive system before and after gritblasting (GB) by peel-off test. CAD-designed experimental test blocks were printed by FDM using acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polyethylene terephthalate glycol copolyester (PETG), and high impact polystyrene (HIPS), and the reference test blocks were made of a conventional light-curing resin (n = 11). Before and after GB, the surface topography of all tray materials was analysed, and the maximum strength of the test block peeled off from a silicone impression/adhesive system was measured. After GB, the arithmetic mean height (Sa) and the valley fluid retention index (Svi) of the four material groups declined (p < 0.05). The peel-off strength of each of the four material groups significantly decreased by GB (p < 0.05), but no statistical difference could be found among them before or after GB. In all peel-off tests, adhesive failure occurred at the adhesive-impression material interface. The results indicated ABS, HIPS, and PETG could provide sufficient adhesion to the adhesive as the conventional light-curing resin, and GB could reduce the roughness generated by FDM and weaken the bonding between the adhesive and the silicone impression.
机译:计算机辅助设计(CAD)和增材制造(AM)在促进定制托盘的制造方面已显示出希望。由于临床要求,定制的托盘材料应实现与压印/胶粘系统的良好粘合。这项研究通过剥离测试评估了喷砂(GB)之前和之后,三种熔融沉积模型(FDM)定制托盘材料对硅树脂印模/粘合剂系统的保留。 FDM使用丙烯腈丁二烯苯乙烯(ABS),聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯共聚聚酯(PETG)和高抗冲聚苯乙烯(HIPS)通过FDM印刷由CAD设计的实验测试块,而参考测试块则由常规的光固化树脂(n = 11)。在GB之前和之后,分析所有托盘材料的表面形貌,并测量从硅酮印模/粘合剂体系剥离的测试块的最大强度。 GB后,四个材料组的算术平均高度(Sa)和谷底流体保留指数(Svi)下降(p <0.05)。四个材料组的每一个的剥离强度均显着降低了GB(p <0.05),但是在GB之前或之后,它们之间没有统计学差异。在所有剥离试验中,在粘合剂-压模材料界面处发生粘合剂破坏。结果表明,ABS,HIPS和PETG可以像传统的光固化树脂那样对粘合剂提供足够的粘合力,而GB可以降低FDM产生的粗糙度并削弱粘合剂与硅树脂印模之间的粘合力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号