首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery >Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Limited-Incision and Standard Cochlear Implantation
【2h】

Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Patients: Comparison of Limited-Incision and Standard Cochlear Implantation

机译:小儿人工耳蜗植入:有限切口和标准人工耳蜗植入的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Today, cochlear implantation has become the standard procedure for rehabilitation of people with impaired sensory neural hearing. This procedure can be done through different techniques. The present study aimed to compare the standard technique (ST) with creation of “C” incision into the scalp with suture fixation and limited-incision technique (LIT) with creation of subperiosteal pocket without any fixation. The outcomes included operative time and complications. This retrospective study was conducted on 343 consecutive cochlear implantations. The patients received cochlear implants at our institution between 2004 and 2011. The complications were identified as “minor” or “major”. All the complications and operation times were assessed for the two surgical techniques. The overall rates of complications were 4.4 % (11 out of 252) and 2.2 % (2 out of 91) for ST and LIT, respectively. The results revealed no significant difference between the two fixation techniques regarding the complications. The mean operation time was 150 ± 23.7 and 133 ± 23.12 min in ST and LIT, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. Both ST and LIT are safe techniques with a relatively low complication rate. However, ST can be effectively replaced by LIT because of its shorter operative time.
机译:如今,耳蜗植入已成为感觉神经听力受损人士康复的标准程序。此过程可以通过不同的技术来完成。本研究旨在将标准技术(ST)与采用缝合线固定术在头皮上形成“ C”切口的情况进行比较,并将有限切口技术(LIT)与不进行任何固定术的骨膜下袋的进行比较。结果包括手术时间和并发症。这项回顾性研究是对343个连续的人工耳蜗进行的。患者于2004年至2011年间在我们的机构接受了人工耳蜗植入。并发症被确定为“轻微”或“严重”。对两种手术技术均评估了所有并发症和手术时间。 ST和LIT的总并发症发生率分别为4.4%(252个中的11个)和2.2%(91个中的2个)。结果显示两种固定技术在并发症方面无显着差异。 ST和LIT的平均手术时间分别为150±23.7和133±23.12min,差异具有统计学意义。 ST和LIT都是安全技术,并发症发生率相对较低。但是,ST可以缩短手术时间,因此可以有效地用LIT代替。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号