首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology >Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection
【2h】

Chlorhexidine Vs. Sterile Vaginal Wash During Labor to Prevent Neonatal Infection

机译:洗必泰Vs.分娩时进行无菌阴道冲洗以防止新生儿感染

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if a dilute solution of chlorhexidine used as a one-time vaginal wash intrapartum can reduce the use of postnatal antibiotics and neonatal infection. Methods: Term pregnant women in labor were prospectively randomized to receive either 20 cc of 0.4% chlorhexidine (n = 481) or 20 cc of sterile water (n = 466) placebo. Exclusion criteria included fetal distress, clinical infection, cervical dilatation >6 cm, and known allergy to chlorhexidine. Outcome variables included the incidence of neonatal pneumonia, culture proven neonatal sepsis, and use of the antibiotics in the neonate. Continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test and discrete variables were compared with the chi-square test. Results: The length of ruptured membranes (mean ± S.D.) between the chlorhexidine group (408 ± 589 min) and control group (352 ± 318 min) was not significantly different (P = 0.85, 95% confidence interval 354–462). Fifteen neonates (3.2%) in the chlorhexidine group and 9 (1.9%) in the control group received antibiotics in the postnatal period (P = 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.72–3.72). There was one case of pneumonia in the control group and no cases of sepsis in either group. Conclusions: A one-time chlorhexidine vaginal wash does not decrease the use of antibiotics or incidence of neonatal infection in our population.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是确定洗必泰的稀释溶液作为一次性阴道内冲洗液可以减少产后抗生素的使用和新生儿感染。方法:将长期分娩的孕妇随机分为20 cc 0.4%洗必泰(n = 481)或20 cc无菌水(n = 466)安慰剂。排除标准包括胎儿窘迫,临床感染,子宫颈扩张> 6 cm和已知对洗必泰过敏。结果变量包括新生儿肺炎的发生率,经培养证实的新生儿败血症以及在新生儿中使用抗生素的情况。连续变量使用Mann-Whitney U检验进行比较,离散变量与卡方检验进行比较。结果:洗必泰组(408±589分钟)与对照组(352±318分钟)之间的破裂膜长度(平均值±标准差)无显着差异(P = 0.85,95%置信区间354–462)。洗必太组中有15例新生儿(3.2%),对照组中有9例(1.9%)在出生后接受了抗生素治疗(P = 0.32,95%置信区间0.72–3.72)。对照组有1例肺炎,两组均无败血症。结论:一次性洗必太阴道清洗不会减少抗生素的使用或在我们的人群中新生儿感染的发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号