首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Indian Journal of Surgery >Liquid Paraffin vs Hyaluronic Acid in Preventing Intraperitoneal Adhesions
【2h】

Liquid Paraffin vs Hyaluronic Acid in Preventing Intraperitoneal Adhesions

机译:液体石蜡与透明质酸预防腹膜粘连

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Adhesion formation after abdominal and pelvic operations remains a challenging problem. Role of adjuvant barriers have been studied but there is no comparative study between liquid paraffin and hyaluronic acid as a barrier method. Hence, we planned to compare the effectiveness of 0.4 % hyaluronic acid and liquid paraffin in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions in rats. This prospective, randomized and controlled study was conducted in 60 adult Wistar albino rats. Surgical trauma by caecal abrasion and 1 g talcum powder was used in the rat model to induce adhesion formation. After trauma, 3 ml normal saline was instilled in the peritoneal cavity in control group (n = 20), 3 ml liquid paraffin was instilled in experimental group A (n = 20) and 3 ml 0.4 % hyaluronic acid was instilled in experimental group B (n = 20). Two weeks after laparotomy, repeat laparotomy was performed and the adhesions were scored according to Zuhlke classification. Liquid paraffin and hyaluronic acid both reduce the extent and grade of adhesions both macroscopically (p = 0.018, p = 0.017) and microscopically (p = 0.019, p = 0.019) respectively. Although there was significant reduction in adhesions by hyaluronic acid at certain specific sites as compared with liquid paraffin, its overall effectiveness in preventing postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions is not significantly different from liquid paraffin (p = 0.092, p = 0.193) respectively. The presence of liquid paraffin and hyaluronic acid in the peritoneal cavity reduce postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions significantly in rats. However, there is no overall significant difference in the effectiveness of two groups. Dosage and safety of these chemicals in human beings remains to be established.
机译:腹部和骨盆手术后的粘连形成仍然是一个难题。已经研究了佐剂屏障的作用,但是液体石蜡和透明质酸作为屏障方法之间没有比较研究。因此,我们计划比较0.4%的透明质酸和液体石蜡在预防大鼠术后腹腔粘连中的有效性。这项前瞻性,随机对照研究是在60只成年Wistar白化病大鼠中进行的。在大鼠模型中使用因盲肠擦伤和1 g滑石粉引起的手术创伤来诱导粘连形成。创伤后,对照组腹膜腔内注入生理盐水3 ml(n = 20),实验组A注入3 ml液体石蜡(n = 20),实验组B注入3 ml 0.4%透明质酸(n = 20)。开腹手术后两周,重复开腹手术,并根据Zuhlke分类对粘连评分。液体石蜡和透明质酸都在宏观上(p = 0.018,p = 0.017)和微观上(p = 0.019,p = 0.019)都降低了粘附的程度和等级。尽管与液体石蜡相比,透明质酸在某些特定部位的粘连明显减少,但其预防术后腹腔内粘连的总体效果与液体石蜡并无显着差异(p = 0.092,p = 0.193)。腹膜腔内液体石蜡和透明质酸的存在可显着降低大鼠术后腹膜内粘连。但是,两组的有效性没有总体上的显着差异。这些化学物质在人体内的剂量和安全性尚待确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号