首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology >Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review
【2h】

Non-mastoidectomy Cochlear Implant Approaches: A Literature Review

机译:非乳突切除术人工耳蜗植入方法:文献综述。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction Posterior tympanotomy approach for cochlear implant (CI) surgery, has been the most commonly used worldwide with current 0.7% rate of facial nerve injury. Non-mastoidectomy CI approaches include the suprameatal approach (SMA) and its modifications, the transcanal approach and its modifications and the pericanal approach for electrode insertion. >Objectives The objective of this study was to review the literature regarding non-mastoidectomy CI approaches. >Data Synthesis A search was performed in the LILACS, MEDLINE, SciELO, PubMed databases and Cochrane Library in February 2015, and the key words used in the search were CI, SMA, transcanal approach, pericanal approach, or electrode extrusion. About 30 studies that met the criteria described in “Study Selection” were read in full. The studies showed 1014 patients that underwent CI by SMA or its modifications, 266 CI patients treated by transcanal approach or its modifications, and 15 patients implanted by the pericanal approach. Reported complication with SMA was 99 (9.8%) minor and 13 (1.3%) major. With transcanal, there were 24 complications; 19 (7.1%) minor and 5 (1.9%) major. No post-operative complication was reported in pericanal approach. Studies showed no reported facial nerve paresis or paralysis in all non-mastoidectomy approaches. >Conclusion Complications rates with non-mastoidectomy approaches are similar to those found in the mastoidectomy approach. Thus, non-mastoidectomy approaches may be an alternative in cases where the conventional mastoidectomy approach is difficult to perform. It would be helpful for CI surgeons to become familiarized with these approaches.
机译:>简介耳蜗植入术(CI)的后鼓室切开术是全世界最常用的方法,目前面神经损伤率为0.7%。非乳突切除术CI方法包括上睑入路(SMA)及其修改,经管入路及其修改以及用于电极插入的经管周入路。 >目的这项研究的目的是回顾有关非乳突切除CI方法的文献。 >数据综合于2015年2月在LILACS,MEDLINE,SciELO,PubMed数据库和Cochrane Library中进行了搜索,搜索中使用的关键词为CI,SMA,经管入路,周管入路或电极挤压。完整阅读了大约30项符合“研究选择”中所述标准的研究。研究显示,有1014例通过SMA或其修饰进行CI的患者,266例经经导管方法或其修饰治疗的CI患者,以及15例经周管植入的患者。报告的SMA并发症为轻度99(9.8%)和重度13(1.3%)。经运河,有24例并发症。 19(7.1%)未成年人和5(1.9%)主要。 can管入路未见术后并发症。研究表明,在所有非乳突切除术方法中均无面部神经麻痹或瘫痪的报道。 >结论非乳突切除术的并发症发生率与乳突切除术的并发症发生率相似。因此,在传统乳突切除术难以执行的情况下,非乳突切除术可能是另一种选择。 CI外科医师熟悉这些方法将很有帮助。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号