首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Dentistry >Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints
【2h】

Efficacy of Esthetic Retainers: Clinical Comparison between Multistranded Wires and Direct-Bond Glass Fiber-Reinforced Composite Splints

机译:美学保持器的功效:多股钢丝和直接粘合玻璃纤维增​​强复合夹板的临床比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this longitudinal prospective randomized study was to evaluate the reliability of two different types of orthodontic retainers in clinical use: a multistrand stainless steel wire and a polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin composite. Moreover the level of satisfaction of the patient about the esthetic result was also analyzed by means of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). 34 patients (9 boys and 25 girls, mean age 14.3), in the finishing phase of orthodontic treatment, were selected for the study. Since splints were applied the number, cause, and date of splint failures were recorded for each single tooth over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired t-test, Kaplan Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to analyze VAS recordings. Differences between the bond failure rates were not statistically significant. Esthetic result of VAS was significantly higher for polyethylene ribbon-reinforced resin retainers than for stainless steel wires.
机译:这项纵向前瞻性随机研究的目的是评估临床使用中两种不同类型的正畸固定器的可靠性:多股不锈钢丝和聚乙烯带状增强树脂复合材料。此外,还通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)分析了患者对美学结果的满意度。选择正畸治疗完成阶段的34例患者(男9例,女25例,平均年龄14.3)进行研究。由于使用了夹板,因此记录了12个月内每个单颗牙齿的夹板失效的数量,原因和日期。使用配对t检验,Kaplan Meier生存估计和对数秩检验进行统计分析。进行了Kruskal Wallis测试以分析VAS记录。粘结失效率之间的差异在统计学上不显着。聚乙烯带状增强树脂保持架的VAS美学效果明显高于不锈钢线。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号