首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Integral movement therapy versus local movement therapy approach in patients with idiopathic chronic low-back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
【2h】

Integral movement therapy versus local movement therapy approach in patients with idiopathic chronic low-back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

机译:特发性慢性下腰痛患者的整体运动疗法与局部运动疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundChronic low-back pain (CLBP) is one of the most common reasons for seeking medical care and it imposes a significant burden on individuals and society at large. Systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of supervised exercise therapies commonly conclude that, to date, there is no evidence to support the superiority of one form of exercise over another. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) to date included mostly trunk strengthening exercises (e.g. bird dog, plank) and there is no evidence about supervised, individually graded integral movement therapy program for patients with CLBP.
机译:背景慢性腰背痛(CLBP)是寻求医疗服务的最常见原因之一,它给个人和整个社会带来了沉重负担。评估监督运动疗法有效性的系统评价通常得出结论,迄今为止,尚无证据支持一种运动形式优于另一种运动形式。迄今为止,随机对照试验(RCT)主要包括躯干强化锻炼(例如,鸟狗,木板),并且没有证据表明CLBP患者接受有监督的,单独分级的整体运动疗法计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号