首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine >Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Nerve root block versus surgery (NERVES) for the treatment of radicular pain secondary to a prolapsed intervertebral disc herniation: study protocol for a multi-centre randomised controlled trial

机译:神经根阻滞与手术(NERVES)治疗椎间盘突出症脱出所致的神经根痛:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundSciatica is a common condition reported to affect over 3% of the UK population at any time and is often caused by a prolapsed intervertebral disc (PID). Although the duration and severity of symptoms can vary, pain persisting beyond 6 weeks is unlikely to recover spontaneously and may require investigation and treatment. Currently, there is no specific care pathway for sciatica in the National Health Service (NHS), and no direct comparison exists between surgical microdiscectomy and transforaminal epidural steroid injection (TFESI). The NERVES (NErve Root block VErsus Surgery) trial aims to address this by comparing clinical and cost-effectiveness of surgical microdiscectomy and TFESI to treat sciatica secondary to a PID.
机译:背景坐骨神经痛是一种常见病,据报道随时会影响英国3%以上的人口,通常是由椎间盘脱垂(PID)引起的。尽管症状的持续时间和严重程度可能会有所不同,但持续超过6周的疼痛不太可能自发恢复,可能需要进行调查和治疗。目前,在国家卫生局(NHS)中尚无针对坐骨神经痛的特殊护理途径,并且在手术微盘切除术和经椎间孔硬膜外注射类固醇注射(TFESI)之间没有直接比较。 NERVES(神经根阻滞性神经外科手术)试验旨在通过比较手术微盘切除术和TFESI治疗继发于PID的坐骨神经痛的临床和成本效益来解决这一问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号