首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Molecular Pathology >One-day detection of PCR amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in clinical samples: ELISA versus Southern blot hybridisation.
【2h】

One-day detection of PCR amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA in clinical samples: ELISA versus Southern blot hybridisation.

机译:一日检测临床样品中PCR扩增的沙眼衣原体DNA:ELISA与Southern blot杂交。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIMS: To compare ELISA and Southern blot hybridisation for the detection of PCR amplified Chlamydia trachomatis DNA extracted from clinical samples; to assess the value of the ELISA method in a clinical setting. METHODS: DNA was extracted from urogenital samples of 508 patients, purified and amplified using C trachomatis specific primers, one of which was endlabelled with biotin. Amplification products were detected by Streptavidin biotin based ELISA and non-radioactive Southern blotting. RESULTS: Of the 508 samples, 29 were positive and 479 negative by both methods. No discrepant results were observed. CONCLUSION: Streptavidin biotin based ELISA and Southern blotting were equally sensitive for detecting PCR amplified C trachomatis DNA. Using ELISA, test results could be generated within a single day.
机译:目的:比较ELISA和Southern blot杂交检测从临床样品中提取的PCR扩增的沙眼衣原体DNA的方法;评估ELISA方法在临床中的价值。方法:从508名患者的泌尿生殖道标本中提取DNA,使用沙眼衣原体特异性引物进行纯化和扩增,其中一种被生物素标记。通过基于链霉亲和素生物素的ELISA和非放射性Southern印迹检测扩增产物。结果:在508个样本中,两种方法均为29例阳性和479例阴性。没有观察到不一致的结果。结论:基于链霉亲和素生物素的ELISA和Southern印迹法对PCR扩增的沙眼衣原体DNA的检测同样敏感。使用ELISA,可以在一天内生成测试结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号