首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Measuring prescribing: the shortcomings of the item.
【2h】

Measuring prescribing: the shortcomings of the item.

机译:衡量处方:该项目的缺点。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES--To assess the validity of the item as a measure of the volume of a drug prescribed; and to investigate the possibility that higher quantities per item are prescribed for patients who are not exempt from the prescription charge. DESIGN--Five substudies. For the first, a frequency distribution was derived of the different quantities per item of 10 commonly used drugs prescribed by 20 randomly selected practices in each of five family health service authority areas. For the second, the variation in average quantity per item for the same drugs in the same practices was calculated. For the third and fourth, variation in average quantity per item for 90 commonly used drugs was calculated for all 90 family health service authorities and for all 14 regional health authorities in England. For the fifth, the average quantity per item for each of the 90 drugs was regressed on the percentage of items exempt from the prescription charge, at family health service authority level, and the percentage of variation explained by the regression found. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Distribution of quantity per item; variation in average quantity per item between the practices, between family health service authorities, and between regions; and percentage of variation between family health service authorities accounted for by exemption from the prescription charge. RESULTS--Wide variation was found in the quantities per item prescribed by the practices, and in the average quantity per item between practices and between family health service authorities. No family health service authority was consistently high or low in quantity per item across the 90 drugs. Variation in average quantity per item was less at regional than at family health service authority level, though still high for many of the drugs. The proportion of variation accounted for by exemption from prescription charges ranged from 0% to 49% across the 90 drugs. CONCLUSIONS--The item is unsuitable as a measure of prescribing volume, even at regional level: a new measure, based on standard daily dosages, is needed. The percentage of the variation in quantity per item accounted for by exemption is inconsistent, and in over half the 90 drugs it was below 20%--therefore it is not a useful predictor.
机译:目的-评估该物品作为处方药量的有效性;并调查是否有可能为无法免除处方费的患者开出更高数量的处方药。设计-五个子研究。首先,在五个家庭卫生服务当局区域中的每个区域中,根据20种随机选择的做法开出的每10种常用药物的不同数量得出频率分布。第二,计算在相同实践中相同药物的每件平均含量的变化。对于第三和第四部分,计算了英格兰所有90个家庭卫生服务机构和所有14个地区卫生机构的90种常用药物每件平均数量的差异。对于第五种,将90种药物中每一种的平均含量按家庭卫生服务当局级别上免除处方费的项目百分比进行回归,并通过回归分析解释差异百分比。主要成果指标-每件物品的数量分配;做法之间,家庭保健服务机构之间以及地区之间每件物品的平均数量变化;和家庭保健服务机构之间的差异百分比通过免除处方费来解决。结果-实践规定的每件物品数量以及实践之间以及家庭卫生服务机构之间的每件物品平均数量差异很大。在这90种药物中,没有任何一个家庭健康服务机构对每种药物的含量始终保持较高或较低的要求。尽管许多药物仍然较高,但区域内每件物品的平均数量差异要小于家庭卫生服务当局的水平。在90种药物中,免除处方药费用的变化比例为0%至49%。结论-该项目不适合作为处方量的量度标准,即使在地区一级也是如此:需要基于标准日剂量的新量度标准。豁免引起的每件商品数量变化的百分比不一致,在90多种药物中,有一半以上低于20%,因此不是有用的预测指标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号