首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Integrated care for diabetes: clinical psychosocial and economic evaluation. Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team.
【2h】

Integrated care for diabetes: clinical psychosocial and economic evaluation. Diabetes Integrated Care Evaluation Team.

机译:糖尿病综合护理:临床社会心理和经济评估。糖尿病综合护理评估小组。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES--To evaluate integrated care for diabetes in clinical, psychosocial, and economic terms. DESIGN--Pragmatic randomised trial. SETTING--Hospital diabetic clinic and three general practice groups in Grampian. PATIENTS--274 adult diabetic patients attending a hospital clinic and registered with one of three general practices. INTERVENTION--Random allocation to conventional hospital clinic care or integrated care. Integrated care patients seen in general practice every three or four months and in the hospital clinic annually. General practitioners were given written guidelines for integrated care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Metabolic control, psychosocial status, knowledge of diabetes, beliefs about control of diabetes, satisfaction with treatment, disruption of normal activities, numbers of consultations and admissions, frequency of metabolic monitoring, costs to patients and NHS. RESULTS--A higher proportion of patients defaulted from conventional care (14 (10%)) than from integrated care (4 (3%), 95% confidence interval of difference 2% to 13%). After two years no significant differences were found between the groups in metabolic control, psychosocial status, knowledge, beliefs about control, satisfaction with treatment, unscheduled admissions, or disruption of normal activities. Integrated care was as effective for insulin dependent as non-insulin dependent patients. Patients in integrated care had more visits and higher frequencies of examination. Costs to patients were lower in integrated care (mean 1.70 pounds) than in conventional care (8 pounds). 88% of patients who experienced integrated care wished to continue with it. CONCLUSIONS--This model of integrated care for diabetes was at least as effective as conventional hospital clinic care.
机译:目标-从临床,社会心理和经济角度评估糖尿病的综合治疗。设计-实用的随机试验。地点-格兰屏的医院糖尿病诊所和三个普通科。患者-274名成年糖尿病患者正在医院就诊,并通过以下三种常规做法之一进行了注册。干预-随机分配给常规医院诊所护理或综合护理。一般护理每三,四个月就诊一次,每年在医院门诊就诊的综合护理患者。向全科医生提供了综合护理的书面指南。主要观察指标-代谢控制,社会心理状态,糖尿病知识,对糖尿病控制的信念,对治疗的满意度,正常活动中断,会诊和入院次数,代谢监测的频率,患者和NHS的费用。结果-传统护理的失访患者比例(14(10%))高于综合护理(4(3%),95%的置信区间相差2%至13%)。两年后,两组之间在代谢控制,心理状态,知识,对控制的信念,对治疗的满意度,计划外入院或正常活动中断方面均未发现显着差异。综合护理对非胰岛素依赖的患者同样有效。接受综合护理的患者有更多的就诊机会和更高的检查频率。综合护理(平均1.70磅)比传统护理(8磅)的患者成本更低。经历过综合护理的患者中有88%希望继续进行综合护理。结论:这种糖尿病综合护理模式至少与常规医院诊所护理一样有效。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 British Medical Journal
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 1994(308),6938
  • 年度 1994
  • 页码 1208–1212
  • 总页数 5
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号