首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Thrombolysis in very elderly people: controlled comparison of SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry and Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive
【2h】

Thrombolysis in very elderly people: controlled comparison of SITS International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry and Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive

机译:老年人溶栓:SITS国际中风溶栓注册中心和国际虚拟中风试验存档的对照比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To assess effect of age on response to alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke.>Design Adjusted controlled comparison of outcomes between non-randomised patients who did or did not undergo thrombolysis. Analysis used Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test and proportional odds logistic regression analysis.>Setting Collaboration between International Stroke Thrombolysis Registry (SITS-ISTR) and Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA).>Participants 23 334 patients from SITS-ISTR (December 2002 to November 2009) who underwent thrombolysis and 6166 from VISTA neuroprotection trials (1998-2007) who did not undergo thrombolysis (as controls). Of the 29 500 patients (3472 aged >80 (“elderly,” mean 84.6), data on 272 patients were missing for baseline National Institutes of Health stroke severity score, leaving 29 228 patients for analysis adjusted for age and baseline severity.>Main outcome measures Functional outcomes at 90 days measured by score on modified Rankin scale.>Results Median severity at baseline was the same for patients who underwent thrombolysis and controls (median baseline stroke scale score: 12 for each group, P=0.14; n=29 228). The distribution of scores on the modified Rankin scale was better among all thrombolysis patients than controls (odds ratio 1.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 1.7; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P<0.001). The association occurred independently among patients aged ≤80 (1.6, 1.5 to 1.7; P<0.001; n=25 789) and in those aged >80 (1.4, 1.3 to 1.6; P<0.001; n=3439). Odds ratios were consistent across all 10 year age ranges above 30, and benefit was significant from age 41 to 90; dichotomised outcomes (score on modified Rankin scale 0-1 v 2-6; 0-2 v 3-6; and 6 (death) v rest) were consistent with the results of the ordinal analysis.>Conclusions Outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke is significantly better in those who undergo thrombolysis compared with those who do not. Increasing age is associated with poorer outcome but the association between thrombolysis treatment and improved outcome is maintained in very elderly people. Age alone should not be a barrier to treatment.
机译:>目的,以评估年龄对急性缺血性卒中对阿替普酶反应的影响。>设计:对接受或未接受溶栓治疗的非随机分组患者进行结局对照比较的调整。分析使用Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel检验和比例比对数Logistic回归分析。>设置国际卒中溶栓注册中心(SITS-ISTR)与虚拟国际卒中试验档案库(VISTA)之间的协作。>参与者 80(“老年人”,平均为84.6)中)中,缺少272名患者的数据,剩下29 228名患者的年龄和基线严重程度进行了调整。 >主要结局指标:根据改良的Rankin量表评分在90天时的功能结局。>结果接受溶栓和对照的患者在基线时的中位严重程度相同(基线中风评分:每组12例,P = 0.14; n = 29 228)。在所有溶栓患者中,改良的Rankin量表的得分分布均好于对照组(赔率1.6,95%置信区间1.5至1.7; Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel P <0.001)。关联独立发生在≤80岁的患者(1.6,1.5至1.7; P <0.001; n = 25 789)和≥80岁的患者(1.4,1.3至1.6; P <0.001; n = 3439) )。在30岁以上的所有10岁年龄段中,赔率均保持一致,收益显着年龄介于41至90岁之间;二分结果(改良兰金评分0-1 v 2-6; 0-2 v 3-6; 6(死亡)v休息)得分与顺序分析结果一致。>结论与未接受溶栓治疗的患者相比,接受急性溶栓治疗的患者的结局明显更好。年龄增加与预后较差有关,但在非常年长的人群中仍维持溶栓治疗与预后改善之间的联系。仅年龄不应该成为治疗的障碍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号