首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Outcomes of population based language promotion for slow to talktoddlers at ages 2 and 3 years: Let’s Learn Language cluster randomisedcontrolled trial
【2h】

Outcomes of population based language promotion for slow to talktoddlers at ages 2 and 3 years: Let’s Learn Language cluster randomisedcontrolled trial

机译:以人口为基础的语言促进结语的结果2岁和3岁的幼儿:让我们随机学习语言分组对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective To determine the benefits of a low intensity parent-toddler language promotion programme delivered to toddlers identified as slow to talk on screening in universal services.>Design Cluster randomised trial nested in a population based survey.>Setting Three local government areas in Melbourne, Australia.>Participants Parents attending 12 month well child checks over a six month period completed a baseline questionnaire. At 18 months, children at or below the 20th centile on an expressive vocabulary checklist entered the trial.>Intervention Maternal and child health centres (clusters) were randomly allocated to intervention (modified “You Make the Difference” programme over six weekly sessions) or control (“usual care”) arms.>Main outcome measures The primary outcome was expressive language (Preschool Language Scale-4) at 2 and 3 years; secondary outcomes were receptive language at 2 and 3 years, vocabulary checklist raw score at 2 and 3 years, Expressive Vocabulary Test at 3 years, and Child Behavior Checklist/1.5-5 raw score at 2 and 3 years.>Results 1217 parents completed the baseline survey; 1138 (93.5%) completed the 18 month checklist, when 301 (26.4%) children had vocabulary scores at or below the 20th centile and were randomised (158 intervention, 143 control). 115 (73%) intervention parents attended at least one session (mean 4.5 sessions), and most reported high satisfaction with the programme. Interimoutcomes at age 2 years were similar in the two groups. Similarly, at age 3years, adjusted mean differences (intervention−control) were −2.4 (95%confidence interval −6.2 to 1.4; P=0.21) for expressive language; −0.3 (−4.2 to3.7; P=0.90) for receptive language; 4.1 (−2.3 to 10.6; P=0.21) for vocabularychecklist; −0.5 (−4.4 to 3.4; P=0.80) for Expressive Vocabulary Test; −0.1 (−1.6to 1.4; P=0.86) for externalising behaviour problems; and −0.1 (−1.3 to 1.2;P=0. 92) for internalising behaviour problems.>Conclusion This community based programme targeting slow to talktoddlers was feasible and acceptable, but little evidence was found that itimproved language or behaviour either immediately or at age 3 years.>Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20953675.
机译:>目的,以确定向在通用服务中筛查较慢的幼儿提供的低强度父母-幼儿语言推广计划的好处。>设计基于人口的调查。>设置位于澳大利亚墨尔本的三个地方政府地区。>参与者在六个月的时间内参加12个月的儿童健康检查的父母填写了基线调查表。在18个月时,具有表达能力的词汇表上20岁以下的儿童进入了试验。>干预母婴保健中心(集群)被随机分配进行干预(修改后的“ You Make the Difference”计划) >主要结局指标:主要结局是2年和3年时的表达语言(学龄前语言量表4);次要结果是2年和3年时的接受语言,2年和3年时的词汇表原始评分,3年时的表达性词汇测验以及2年和3年时儿童行为清单/1.5-5原始评分。>结果 1217位父母完成了基线调查; 1138名(93.5%)完成了18个月的检查清单,当时301名(26.4%)儿童的词汇分数在20分位数或以下,并且被随机分配(158干预,143对照)。 115位(73%)干预父母至少参加了一次会议(平均4.5次会议),并且大多数人对该计划表示高度满意。临时两组在2岁时的结局相似。同样,在3岁时年,调整后的平均差异(干预-控制)为-2.4(95%置信区间-6.2至1.4; P = 0.21)表示语言; −0.3(−4.2至3.7; P = 0.90)接受语言;词汇4.1(−2.3至10.6; P = 0.21)清单-0.5(-4.4至3.4; P = 0.80),用于表达性词汇测试; −0.1(−1.6至1.4; P = 0.86)来解决行为问题;和-0.1(-1.3至1.2;P = 0。 92)来解决内在的行为问题。>结论幼儿是可行且可以接受的,但几乎没有证据表明立即或在3岁时改善语言或行为。>试验注册当前受控的试验ISRCTN20953675。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号