首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Medical Journal >Prescribing at the hospital-general practice interface. II: Impact of hospital outpatient dispensing policies in England on general practitioners and hospital consultants.
【2h】

Prescribing at the hospital-general practice interface. II: Impact of hospital outpatient dispensing policies in England on general practitioners and hospital consultants.

机译:在医院-普通实践界面上开处方。 II:英国医院门诊配药政策对全科医生和医院顾问的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE--To assess the impact on general practitioners and hospital consultants of hospital outpatient dispensing policies in England. DESIGN--Postal questionnaire and telephone interview survey of general practitioners and hospital consultants in January 1991. SETTING--94 selected major acute hospitals in England. PARTICIPANTS--20 general practitioners in the vicinity of each of 94 selected hospitals and eight consultants from each, selected by chief pharmacists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Proportions of general practitioners unable to assume responsibility for specialist drugs and of consultants wishing to retain responsibility; association between dispensing restrictions and the frequency of general practitioners being asked to prescribe hospital initiated treatments. RESULTS--Completed questionnaires were obtained from 1207 (64%) of 1887 general practitioners and 457 (63%) of 729 consultants. 570 (46%) general practitioners felt unable to take responsibility for certain treatments, principally because of difficulty in detecting side effects (367, 30%), uncertainty about explaining treatment to patients (332, 28%), and difficulty monitoring dosage (294, 24%). Among consultants 328 (72%) wished to retain responsibility, principally because of specialist need for monitoring (93, 20%), urgent need to commence treatment (64, 14%), and specialist need to initiate or stabilise treatment (63, 14%). The more restricted the drug supply to outpatients, the more frequently consultants asked general practitioners to prescribe (p less than 0.01) and complete a short course of treatment initiated by the hospital (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSIONS--Restrictive hospital outpatient dispensing shifts clinical responsibility on to general practitioners. Hospital doctors should be able to retain responsibility for prescribing when the general practitioner is unfamiliar with the drug or there is a specialist need to initiate, stabilise, or monitor treatment.
机译:目的-评估英格兰医院门诊配药政策对全科医生和医院顾问的影响。设计-1991年1月对全科医生和医院顾问进行的邮寄问卷和电话访问调查。地点-94选择了英格兰的主要急诊医院。参与者--20名选定医院附近每家医院的全科医生和由首席药剂师选定的每家医院的八名顾问。主要观察指标-不能承担专业药物责任的全科医生和希望保留责任的顾问的比例;配药限制与要求全科医生开处方医院启动治疗的频率之间的关联。结果-从1887名全科医生的1207名(64%)和729名顾问的457名(63%)中获得了完整的调查表。 570名(46%)全科医生感到无法对某些治疗承担责任,主要是因为难以发现副作用(367,30%),向患者解释治疗的不确定性(332,28%)和监测剂量的困难(294 ,24%)。在顾问中,有328名(72%)希望保留责任,主要是因为专家需要监控(93,20%),紧急需要开始治疗(64,14%)和专家需要开始或稳定治疗(63,14) %)。对门诊病人的药物供应越受限,顾问就越频繁地要求全科医生开处方(P小于0.01)并完成由医院启动的短期治疗(P小于0.001)。结论-限制性医院门诊分配将临床责任转移到全科医生。当全科医生不熟悉该药物或有专家需要启动,稳定或监测治疗时,医院医生应能够保留开处方的责任。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号