首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>British Journal of Pharmacology >Does Gallery Lighting Really Have an Impact on Appreciation of Art? An Ecologically Valid Study of Lighting Changes and the Assessment and Emotional Experience With Representational and Abstract Paintings
【2h】

Does Gallery Lighting Really Have an Impact on Appreciation of Art? An Ecologically Valid Study of Lighting Changes and the Assessment and Emotional Experience With Representational and Abstract Paintings

机译:画廊照明真的会影响艺术欣赏吗?具有代表性的抽象绘画对照明变化及评估和情感体验的生态学研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report two studies considering the potential for gallery lighting conditions to modulate appraisals and emotional experience with works of visual art. As recently documented in a number of papers, art appreciation represents a complex blend of formal artwork factors, personalities and backgrounds of viewers, and multiple aspects of context regarding where and how art is experienced. Among the latter, lighting would be expected to play a fundamental role. However, surprisingly, this has received little empirical assessment, with almost no ecologically valid gallery analyses and no between-participant designs which would minimize awareness of lighting changes themselves. Here, we employed a controlled paradigm using a spontaneous art viewing context, a gallery-like setting, and a proprietary lighting system which allowed the minute adjustment of lighting intensity/temperature (CCT). Participants viewed a selection of original representational and abstract art under three different CCT conditions (Study 1), modulated between participants, and then reported on their artwork appraisal and emotional experience. The selected lighting temperatures were chosen based on an initial investigation of existing art museums within the Vienna area, addressing how these institutions themselves light their art—a question which, also somewhat surprisingly, has not often been considered. We also allowed the same participants to set the light temperature themselves in order to test hypotheses regarding what might be an ‘ideal’ lighting condition for art. In Study 2, we explored the question of whether artworks made by an artist to match specific lighting conditions show a resulting connection to the ratings of viewers when shown in the same or different light. Results showed almost no effects from lighting changes in both studies. Viewers’ self-set light temperature (mean = 3777 K) did roughly coincide with the suggested most enjoyable conditions for everyday living and some past research on art viewing, but again showed wide interpersonal variance. Results, and a general review of lighting factors are considered in order to provide art researchers and curators with a tool for conducting future study.
机译:我们报告了两项研究,这些研究考虑了画廊照明条件可能会改变视觉艺术作品的评估和情感体验。正如最近在许多论文中所记录的那样,艺术欣赏代表了形式艺术品因素,观看者的个性和背景以及有关在何处以及如何体验艺术的上下文的多个方面的复杂融合。在后者中,照明将有望发挥根本作用。然而,令人惊讶的是,这几乎没有进行任何实证评估,几乎没有生态学上有效的画廊分析,也没有参加者之间的设计,这些设计可以使人们对照明变化本身的认识降至最低。在这里,我们采用了一种自发的艺术观看环境,类似画廊的环境以及专有的照明系统来控制范式,该系统允许对照明强度/温度(CCT)进行微调。参加者在三种不同的CCT条件下查看了原始代表性艺术和抽象艺术的选择(研究1),在参加者之间进行了调整,然后报告了他们的艺术品鉴定和情感体验。选择的照明温度是基于对维也纳地区现有美术馆的初步调查而选择的,解决了这些机构自身如何照亮其艺术的问题-有点令人惊讶的是,这一问题并未经常被考虑。我们还允许相同的参与者自己设置灯光温度,以检验关于可能是艺术“理想”照明条件的假设。在研究2中,我们探讨了一个问题,即当艺术家以相同或不同的光线显示时,其艺术家为匹配特定照明条件而制作的艺术品是否显示出与观看者收视率的联系。结果表明,在两项研究中,照明变化几乎没有影响。观众的自定义灯光温度(平均= 3777 K)与建议的日常生活中最令人愉快的条件以及过去有关艺术观看的一些研究大致吻合,但又显示出很大的人际差异。为了给艺术研究者和策展人提供进行未来研究的工具,考虑了研究结果以及对照明因素的总体评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号