首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annual Meeting of the American Climatological Association >Academic-industrial collaboration: the good the bad and the ugly.
【2h】

Academic-industrial collaboration: the good the bad and the ugly.

机译:产学合作:好坏和丑。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Academic-industrial collaborations and technology transfer have over the past 50 years played an increasingly prominent role in the biomedical sciences. University partnerships with industry can expedite the availability of innovative drugs and other medical technologies, bringing both important public health benefits and a source of income for universities and their faculty through a variety of financial arrangements. However, these relationships raise ethical concerns, particularly when research involves human subjects in clinical trials. Lapses in oversight of industry-sponsored clinical trials at universities, and especially patient deaths in a number of trials, have brought these issues into the public spotlight and have led the federal government to intensify its oversight of clinical research. The leadership of Harvard Medical School convened a group of leaders in academic medicine to formulate guidelines on individual financial conflicts of interest. They and other groups are working to formulate a national consensus on this issue.
机译:在过去的50年中,产学合作和技术转让在生物医学科学中发挥着越来越重要的作用。大学与工业界的伙伴关系可以加快创新药物和其他医疗技术的可用性,通过各种财务安排,为大学及其教职员工带来重要的公共卫生利益和收入来源。但是,这些关系引起了伦理方面的关注,尤其是当研究涉及人类受试者进行临床试验时。对大学赞助的行业临床试验的监督不力,尤其是在许多试验中,患者死亡使这些问题成为公众关注的焦点,并导致联邦政府加强了对临床研究的监督。哈佛医学院的领导召集了一组学术医学领导者,以制定有关个人财务利益冲突的准则。他们和其他团体正在努力就此问题达成全国共识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号