首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Tobacco Industry Use of Personal Responsibility Rhetoric in PublicRelations and Litigation: Disguising Freedom to Blame as Freedom ofChoice
【2h】

Tobacco Industry Use of Personal Responsibility Rhetoric in PublicRelations and Litigation: Disguising Freedom to Blame as Freedom ofChoice

机译:烟草业在公众场合使用个人责任修辞关系和诉讼:将自由归咎于自由选择

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We examined the tobacco industry’s rhetoric to frame personal responsibility arguments. The industry rarely uses the phrase “personal responsibility” explicitly, but rather “freedom of choice.” When freedom of choice is used in the context of litigation, the industry means that those who choose to smoke are solely to blame for their injuries. When used in the industry’s public relations messages, it grounds its meaning in the concept of liberty and the right to smoke. The courtroom “blame rhetoric” has influenced the industry’s larger public relations message to shift responsibility away from the tobacco companies and onto their customers. Understanding the rhetoric and framing that the industry employs is essential to combating this tactic, and we apply this comprehension to other industries that act as disease vectors.
机译:我们研究了烟草业的措辞,以阐述个人责任论点。该行业很少明确使用“个人责任”一词,而是“选择自由”。当在诉讼中使用选择自由时,行业意味着那些选择吸烟的人应该为自己的伤害负责。当在行业的公共关系信息中使用时,它的含义基于自由和吸烟权的概念。法庭上的“责备言论”影响了烟草业更大的公共关系信息,使责任从烟草公司转移到了顾客身上。了解该行业使用的措辞和框架对于打击这种策略至关重要,我们将这种理解应用于其他充当疾病媒介的行业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号