首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Public Hygiene >Nurse practitioner and physician assistant practices in three HMOs: implications for future US health manpower needs.
【2h】

Nurse practitioner and physician assistant practices in three HMOs: implications for future US health manpower needs.

机译:三种HMO中的护士从业者和医师助理实践:对未来美国卫生人力需求的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study empirically examines the practices of non-physician providers (NPPs) within three large competitive health maintenance organizations (HMOs), as well as the physicians' and NPPs' views regarding the ideal role of NPPs. These roles are compared with NPP delegation patterns incorporated in the modeling methodology developed by the Graduate Medical Education National Advisory Committee (GMENAC). GMENAC recommended relatively high levels of delegation by physicians to NPPs. One of the HMO sites made use of NPPs at rates even higher than GMENAC's national ideals, while the rates at the other two were lower. The normative ideals for pediatric NPPs developed at each HMO were consistently higher than their actual roles. Concerns with acceptance and the role of NPPs are clearly no longer issues. Instead, the limits on NPP involvement appear to relate to considerations of costs, availability, and the increasing numbers of physicians competing for similar opportunities.
机译:这项研究从经验上考察了三个大型竞争性健康维护组织(HMO)中非医师提供者(NPP)的做法,以及医师和NPP关于NPP理想角色的观点。将这些角色与由研究生医学教育国家咨询委员会(GMENAC)开发的建模方法中纳入的NPP委托模式进行了比较。 GMENAC建议医师对NPP进行较高级别的授权。一个HMO站点使用NPP的比率甚至高于GMENAC的国家理想,而另外两个站点的比率则较低。每个HMO制定的儿科NPP的理想规范始终高于其实际角色。毫无疑问,人们不再关心核电厂的接受和核电厂的作用。相反,对NPP参与的限制似乎与对成本,可用性的考虑以及越来越多的医生争夺类似机会有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号