首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Aesculapian >Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction
【2h】

Best methods for evaluating educational impact: a comparison of the efficacy of commonly used measures of library instruction

机译:评估教育影响的最佳方法:比较图书馆教学常用措施的功效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives and Background:Libraries are increasingly called upon to demonstrate student learning outcomes and the tangible benefits of library educational programs. This study reviewed and compared the efficacy of traditionally used measures for assessing library instruction, examining the benefits and drawbacks of assessment measures and exploring the extent to which knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors actually paralleled demonstrated skill levels.
机译:目标和背景:越来越多地要求图书馆展示学生的学习成果和图书馆教育计划的切实好处。这项研究回顾并比较了用于评估图书馆教学,评估评估措施的利弊的传统措施的有效性,并探讨了知识,态度和行为与技能水平实际相符的程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号