首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Aesculapian >Centralization vs. Decentralization in Medical School Libraries
【2h】

Centralization vs. Decentralization in Medical School Libraries

机译:医学院图书馆的集中化与分散化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Does the medical school library in the United States operate more commonly under the university library or the medical school administration? University-connected medical school libraries were asked to indicate (a) the source of their budgets, whether from the central library or the medical school, and (b) the responsibility for their acquisitions and cataloging. Returns received from sixtyeight of the seventy eligible institutions showed decentralization to be much the most common: 71 percent of the libraries are funded by their medical schools; 79 percent are responsible for their own acquisitions and processing. The factor most often associated with centralization of both budget and operation is public ownership. Decentralization is associated with service to one or two rather than three or more professional schools. Location of the medical school in a different city from the university is highly favorable to autonomy. Other factors associated with these trends are discussed.
机译:美国的医学院图书馆在大学图书馆或医学院管理之下是否更普遍运作?与大学相连的医学院图书馆被要求指出(a)其预算来源,是来自中央图书馆还是医学院,以及(b)其采购和编目的责任。从70个符合条件的机构中的68个机构收到的回报表明,权力下放是最常见的做法:71%的图书馆是由其医学院资助的; 79%负责自己的采购和处理。与预算和运营的集中化最经常相关的因素是公有制。权力下放与为一两个或两个而不是三个或更多的专业学校提供服务有关。医学院与大学位于不同城市的位置非常有利于自治。讨论了与这些趋势相关的其他因素。

著录项

  • 期刊名称 The Aesculapian
  • 作者

    Helen Crawford;

  • 作者单位
  • 年(卷),期 1966(54),3
  • 年度 1966
  • 页码 199–205
  • 总页数 7
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号